Criterion 10 of 14 · Results evidence
Which OnlyFans agencies can back up their results?
Screenshots of dashboards are everywhere and verification routes are rare. This page separates figures, artifacts and a route an outsider can actually take.
As of 12 September 2026, 4 of the 19 OnlyFans management agencies scored by OF Agency Ranking meet this criterion in full: FantasyRise, OnModelStudios, Aruna Talent, Creators Inc.. 14 meet it partly and 1 publishes nothing that meets it. Every line below links to the page it rests on and the date it was read.
- In full (4): FantasyRise, OnModelStudios, Aruna Talent, Creators Inc.
- Partly (14): Lumina Connect, Foxy Studios, Bunny Agency, SirenCY, TDM Agency, Louna's Models, FansHub, TopStar Management, XCreatorMgmt, AROA Agency, Seluna, Vantage Agency, Teasy Agency, AT Agency
- Not at all (1): Lush Management
Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.
Why this one is scored at all
Every agency claims growth. Few give a creator a way to check the claim before signing.
What counts. Results are shown with a way to check them: payout screenshots published with permission, a results page, a creator reference on request, or a live-dashboard offer.
How it is scored
- 10 = artifacts plus a verification route.
- 6 = artifacts without a route.
- 3 = figures without artifacts.
- 0 = none.
Equal weight with the other thirteen criteria: this one is worth exactly as much as any other, and the total is their mean. The criterion on the methodology page.
Every scored agency on this criterion
| Agency | Score | What it publishes, with source and date |
|---|---|---|
| FantasyRise #1 overall, 9.1/10 | 10/10 Published | Reviews page: "8 real payout screenshots published, with permission", results by starting point on the results page, and a stated verification route: "A reference from a creator we currently manage is available on request, subject to her agreement. Ask before you apply; being unable to arrange one would be her decision, not ours." Route exercised: a currently managed creator confirmed on 12 September 2026 that she is available as a reference on request; recorded here without her name. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| OnModelStudios #2 overall, 7.5/10 | 10/10 Published | Dashboard screenshots with figures, own statements: "Anna - $4,252,038 all-time", "$52,132 net in August 2026 · 68% earned in messages", and on the results page "No edits, no overlays: $4,252,038.72 all-time, $52,132.50 net in August 2026", "Sarah - $2,480,355 all-time", and the site-wide "$11M+ generated for creators since 2021". Video testimonials, a case study, and a verification route: "We walk serious applicants through screens like this live on a call." Source · checked 11 September 2026 |
| Aruna Talent #4 overall, 6.1/10 | 10/10 Published | A results page with figures (own statements: "$3,072,005, one account, from zero", "$10M+ annual creator revenue") and a verification route: "On your first call, you pick any creator on our roster. We open her live OnlyFans dashboard while you watch." Testimonials carry initials only. Source · checked 11 September 2026 |
| Creators Inc. #18 overall, 2.1/10 | 10/10 Published | Named, public references with linked press. Homepage: "Shannon Elizabeth", "Hollywood actress", "As seen in Yahoo Finance", "$1.2M first week", over "Shannon Elizabeth went direct-to-fan with Creators Inc and grossed seven figures right out of the gate". Donna Mills, Sophie Rain and Larsa Pippen are named the same way. Aggregate figures, own statements: "$2B+ in creator sales", "100M+ Monthly views". No dashboard screenshots. The comparison page publishes a verification route: "06 The references. Current creators you can contact directly, without us in the room." and "05 The reporting sample. A real weekly report: acquisition, retention, PPV, chat and revenue, not a screenshot highlight reel." Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| Lumina Connect #3 overall, 6.2/10 | 6/10 Partly published | A results page with three case studies carrying dashboard images and figures, own statements: $925,761 net in the first year against $199,016 in three years solo; $822k in ten months, "steady months between $43k and $62k, straight from the dashboard"; and "+1,090% in one year. From around $2k a month to $204,907 net in 365 days." A video interview, and the disclaimer "These are best cases, not averages." Creators are anonymous by stated policy: "nobody gets named without approval." The verification line, "every point is verifiable on the call", names no reference and no dashboard demonstration, so no verification route is published. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| Bunny Agency #6 overall, 5.6/10 | 6/10 Partly published | Case studies with figures, own statements: "$0 → $330K. Monthly revenue in 3.5 months", "$2K → $33K. Monthly revenue in 2 months", and the site-wide "400+ Creators Managed. $35M+ Revenue Generated." Each carries a team-recorded video and dashboard screenshots. No live-dashboard offer and no named creator references found, so no verification route. Source · checked 11 September 2026 |
| Teasy Agency #17 overall, 2.3/10 | 6/10 Partly published | Two homepage galleries ("Our Agency Results", "Success Stories") of unlabeled dashboard screenshots, files stats-23 to stats-49 and teasy-stats-2 to teasy-stats-4; no figure is stated as text. Testimonials by first name ("Monica", "Mickaela", "Brianna"). No results page (/results is 404), no reference offer, no dashboard demonstration offered. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| Foxy Studios #5 overall, 5.7/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Extensive figures on the homepage ("$14M+ generated", "$87,000 in 30 days", own statements), anonymized case studies, no screenshots, no results page (/results is 404), a dashboard promised to signed creators, no live-dashboard offer for applicants, no references. Source · checked 11 September 2026 |
| SirenCY #7 overall, 5.4/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Homepage shows anonymized before-and-after image pairs with no figures. Figures ("$130K/month top result", "312+ creators managed") appear only in llms-full.txt. No live-dashboard offer, no named reference, no case study page. The site's own guidance on what a real case study needs is the standard it does not meet: "For a real case study, request inspectable source evidence, the starting conditions, the fee basis, the measurement period, the creator's contribution, and permission to publish." Source · checked 11 September 2026 |
| TDM Agency #8 overall, 4.1/10 | 3/10 Partly published | A success-stories page and blog case studies with figures, own statements, first names or aliases only. The largest is in a blog case study: "Over the last 12 months shown in your screenshot, Sienna's account produced: $2,802,703.38 net / $3,503,541.51 gross." The screenshot the sentence refers to is described but not published, there is no live-dashboard offer and no reference is named. Source · checked 11 September 2026 |
| Louna's Models #9 overall, 3.8/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Percentages and ranges, all own statements, no screenshots, no case studies, no results page: "between $5,000 and $30,000+ per month", "PPV sales +40% on average", "+150% de revenus en 90 jours, +40% PPV, engagement +30%" on the services page, left in French on the English site, "150 average income after 3 months" (unit missing). Named testimonials without links ("Tory Sweety", "Valeria Guseva"). "4.8 ★ from 46 reviews" on the page against 4.1 from 39 in its structured data. No reference offer, no dashboard demonstration. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| FansHub #10 overall, 3.4/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Animated counters on the homepage ("Revenue Generated $90M+", "Views 5B+", "Creators Globally 80+", own statements), no screenshots, no case studies, no results page. Six testimonials with first names and Instagram handles, unquantified ("My income has grown"). No reference offer or dashboard demonstration. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| TopStar Management #11 overall, 3.0/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Aggregates, own statements: "200+ Creators Scaled Worldwide", "$2M+ In Creator Revenue Generated" ("€2M" on the Croatian site), "more creators ... than any other company". Creator videos without names or text; no screenshots, case studies or references; no verification route. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| XCreatorMgmt #12 overall, 2.9/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Claims without artifacts, own statements: "our success rate is 100%", creators "making over $10k to $15k a month", "grow creators 2x to 4x a month". The case-studies page shows "No items found." No screenshots, no testimonials, no references, no verification route. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| AROA Agency #13 overall, 2.9/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Percentages and examples, all own statements, no screenshots, no case study with a period, no results page: "300% Revenue Growth in 60 Days" (as an average), "70% of Our Models Doubled Income in 30 Days", "92% Creator 3-month retention rate", "+600% revenue boost", "up to $120,000/month". Video testimonials by first name and rank: "Sarah", "Top 0.1% Content Creator". No reference offer, no dashboard demonstration. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| Seluna #14 overall, 2.7/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Two image tiles captioned "$346,765 With Us" and "$1,073,919 With Us" without name, period or starting point; ticker claims "7-Figure Revenue Every Single Month" and "Verified Partner of CreatorHero"; promise of "first earnings in 7 days". No testimonials, no named references, no reference offer or dashboard demonstration. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| Vantage Agency #15 overall, 2.6/10 | 3/10 Partly published | Figures without artifacts. Aggregates: "$3.4M+ paid out to talent in the last 12 months", "4.8× average revenue growth in the first 90 days", "92% of talent grow revenue in the first 60 days". Three anonymous testimonials with joining dates and growth percentages. No screenshots, no dashboards, no case study page, no named reference, no offer to show a payout on request. The site states its own reason: "Private results." and "Names withheld by contract." Nothing shows who verified them. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| AT Agency #19 overall, 1.6/10 | 3/10 Partly published | A carousel of result tiles giving a first name and a rank, "DELFINE / TOP 0.05% OF ALL CREATORS" and "MAYA / TOP 0.04% OF ALL CREATORS", with no figures; three anonymous testimonials; counters, "12+ / CREATORS MANAGED"; press logos without linked articles. The qualifier sits on a different page: the terms of service say those outcomes "represent individual outcomes and are not typical", which the homepage does not repeat beside the ranks. No reference offer and no dashboard demonstration. Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
| Lush Management #16 overall, 2.4/10 | 0/10 Not found on the site | No figures, screenshots or named references. The "Success Stories" section shows the template placeholder "EMILY (21)" six times with "This is some text inside of a div block"; the counters for models under management, traffic and revenue read 0 in the source. FAQ claims only "propelling them from the top 10% to the top 0.01%". Source · checked 12 September 2026 |
Ordered by score on this criterion, then by overall rank. A 0 means the fact was not found on the agency’s own site on the date shown, or was published in a form that scores 0 under the band; the status beside each score says which. Machine-readable: ranking.json.
The other thirteen criteria
Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission rate?Which OnlyFans agencies let the creator keep her login?Which OnlyFans agencies send payouts straight to the creator?Which OnlyFans agencies publish no minimum term?Which OnlyFans agencies take a commission after you leave?Which OnlyFans agencies charge upfront fees?Which OnlyFans agencies say the creator owns her content?Which OnlyFans agencies publish a verifiable legal entity?How long have these OnlyFans agencies actually existed?Which OnlyFans agencies say who should not sign with them?What does an OnlyFans agency commission actually cover?How big are these OnlyFans agencies?Which OnlyFans agencies include leak protection, and how?
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Which OnlyFans agencies can back up their results?”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/criteria/results-evidence. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.