FantasyRise: OnlyFans management agency review and score

Ranked on published terms. The gap between FantasyRise (9.1/10, #1) and OnModelStudios (7.5/10, #2) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.

FantasyRise scores higher on 6 criteria: No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (10 vs 5); Commission published (10 vs 5); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6); Content protection included and described (10 vs 7).

OnModelStudios scores higher on 2 criteria: Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 4); Longevity, documented (7 vs 4).

Both score the same on 6 criteria. Net difference: 1.6 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.

• Account management and pricing
• Chat management
• Marketing and audience growth
• Content planning and branding
• Equipment and startup costs fronted on the Starter Track
• Leak monitoring and takedowns, included

• One creator has worked with FantasyRise since 2021 with no leaked content of hers found online across that period. This is the agency's own statement. It cannot be verified without exposing the creator, so it is shown here and not scored.
• Until 12 September 2026 the site stated a Florida registration; the register shows a Wyoming LLC with its office in Florida, and the site was corrected the same day this index checked it. Shown because the index applies the same check to its publisher.

Statements the agency makes that cannot be verified without exposing a creator or that have no public evidence route. They are shown so you can ask about them, and they do not count toward the score.

A creator who wants to read the terms before the call, keep her own login, and be one of five rather than one of four hundred. Not for a creator who wants multi-platform scale or a large team behind her.

• Desirely: 6 of 6 facts verified, listed first of the 243 agencies with a profile (checked 14 September 2026). Desirely checks whether an agency's own site publishes a live website, an identifiable legal entity, legal pages, a commission figure, named platforms and more than one language; its own directory reports that 5% of the agencies it lists state a commission and 18% publish a legal entity. The listing was unsolicited. Source
• OFAgencies: 9.5/10, ranked #3 of 59 (checked 10 September 2026). OFAgencies is a project of the team behind OnModelStudios, which it ranks #1; the FantasyRise listing was unsolicited. Source

• How we work (the six commitments)
• Is FantasyRise legit? (entity, register, address)
• Homepage and FAQ
• Reviews and payout screenshots
• Best agencies comparison (names competitors as better fits)
• Leaked content takedown
• Starter Track
• llms.txt
• Wyoming register, filing ID 2024-001405482
• Fiverr portfolio entry, October 2023

Every source is the agency's own published page or a public register, checked on the date shown.

FantasyRise is operated by FantasyRise LLC, which also publishes this ranking. This relationship is disclosed so that readers can evaluate the ranking in context. The scoring criteria are published in full and applied identically to every agency, every cell on this page links to the source it rests on with the date it was read, and the correction policy applies here as it does everywhere else.

Disclosure · Methodology · Right of reply

Nothing to publish here: the right of reply exists so that an agency can contest a score set by someone else, and this agency and the index have the same operator.