Comparison · #1 vs #5 · November 2026
FantasyRise vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared
FantasyRise (#1, 9.6/10, United States): FantasyRise publishes a 30–60% net commission range, 30–50% on its Growth track from about $5,000 a month, 25% of chat revenue for chat-only management, no minimum term, no commission after exit, no upfront cost, and the creator keeps her own login. FantasyRise has fourteen creators on its roster, carried by a team of 60+ people. Foxy Studios (#5, 6.2/10, Switzerland): Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
FantasyRise ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
FantasyRise: A creator who wants to read the terms before the call, keep her own login, and have four or more named people on her account out of a team of 60+, as one of fourteen creators rather than one of four hundred.
Foxy Studios: A creator who wants a female-led Swiss agency that takes six creators a quarter, and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants sole control of her login written into the terms. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why FantasyRise ranks above Foxy Studios
Ranked on published terms. The gap between FantasyRise (9.6/10, #1) and Foxy Studios (6.2/10, #5) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
FantasyRise scores higher on 7 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5); Content protection included and described (10 vs 5).
Foxy Studios scores higher on no criterion.
Both score the same on 7 criteria. Net difference: 3.4 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | FantasyRise | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 30–60% of net earnings; 30–50% on the Growth track, for accounts from about $5,000 a month; chat-only management 25% of chat revenue, tips and subscriptions excluded | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; a higher tier is set on a call |
| Basis | Net, after OnlyFans' 20% platform fee | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis |
| Minimum term | None | None; month-to-month, in the terms |
| Notice period | None: "no notice period", "leave any time, effective immediately" | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms |
| Commission after exit | None | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval |
| Who holds the login | Creator only, during and after | Two statements: "Creators keep their accounts, content, and logins. Always." (own ranking article) and, in the terms, the agency hands back "account credentials ... in our possession within 14 days" |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator's bank account | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) |
| Content ownership | Creator | Creator, in the terms |
| Binding agreement public | Yes. Terms, privacy policy and the six commitments are public documents on the site. | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | FantasyRise | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 7 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
FantasyRise profile · Foxy Studios profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “FantasyRise vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/fantasyrise-vs-foxy-studios. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.