Comparison · #1 vs #5 · September 2026

FantasyRise vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared

FantasyRise (#1, 9.1/10, United States): Publishes a 30–60% net commission range, no minimum term, no commission after exit, no upfront cost, and the creator keeps her own login. Five creators on the roster by choice. Foxy Studios (#5, 5.7/10, Switzerland): Publishes the most terms of any agency in the index: a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. Does not publish who holds the login, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.

FantasyRise ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.

FantasyRise: A creator who wants to read the terms before the call, keep her own login, and be one of five rather than one of four hundred. Not for a creator who wants multi-platform scale or a large team behind her.

Foxy Studios: An established creator with an audience who wants the rate and the exit in writing before the first call and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.

Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.

Why FantasyRise ranks above Foxy Studios

Ranked on published terms. The gap between FantasyRise (9.1/10, #1) and Foxy Studios (5.7/10, #5) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.

FantasyRise scores higher on 7 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Content protection included and described (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5).

Foxy Studios scores higher on 2 criteria: Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 4); Longevity, documented (7 vs 4).

Both score the same on 5 criteria. Net difference: 3.4 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.

Published terms side by side

TermFantasyRiseFoxy Studios
Commission30–60% of net earnings55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; elite tier above $50,000 a month set on a call
BasisNet, after OnlyFans' 20% platform feeNet, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis
Minimum termNoneNone; month-to-month, in the terms
Notice periodNone: "no notice period", "leave any time, effective immediately"30 days written notice, either party, in the terms
Commission after exitNoneNot published
Upfront costNoneNone: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval
Who holds the loginCreator only, during and afterNot published; the terms provide that on termination Foxy Studios hands back "account credentials, content libraries, and any other materials in our possession within 14 days", which says the agency holds credentials without saying whose they are
Where payouts goDirect to the creator's bank account"We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page)
Content ownershipCreatorCreator, in the terms
Binding agreement publicYes. Terms, privacy policy and the six commitments are public documents on the site.No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship."

Scorecard side by side, with status and source

CriterionFantasyRiseFoxy Studios
Commission published10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
Creator keeps sole login10
Published
Source
0
Not found on the site
Source
Payouts go direct to the creator10
Published
Source
0
Published, scores 0 under the band
Source
No minimum term, clear exit10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
No commission after exit10
Published
Source
0
Not found on the site
Source
No upfront cost10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
Creator owns the content10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
Verifiable legal entity10
Published
Source
5
Partly published
Source
Longevity, documented4
Partly published
Source
7
Partly published
Source
Results with a verification route10
Published
Source
3
Partly published
Source
Says who should not sign10
Published
Source
5
Partly published
Source
Scope of the commission itemized10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
Scale and infrastructure, published4
Partly published
Source
10
Published
Source
Content protection included and described10
Published
Source
0
Not found on the site
Source

Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.

FantasyRise profile · Foxy Studios profile · Main ranking

Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.

Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “FantasyRise vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/fantasyrise-vs-foxy-studios. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.