How agencies are scored

The principle

This is a ranking of what a creator can verify before signing, not of size or reputation. Most of what goes wrong between creators and agencies goes wrong in terms that were never shown: the commission quoted on a call, the login handed over at onboarding, the post-exit percentage in clause 14. An agency that prints those terms has given up the ability to change them quietly. That is worth more to a creator than a large team, and the rubric weights it that way by treating every criterion equally and scoring silence as zero.

The rule cuts against the publisher too. FantasyRise, whose team publishes this index, is scored on the same fourteen criteria, loses points where its published facts are weaker (scale, longevity), and carries the same limitations block as every other profile. If another agency publishes more, it ranks higher, and the changelog will show it.

Evidence rules

• Only the agency's own published pages and public registers count. Third-party listings, reviews and press are shown on the profile under "What others say" and never scored.
• Every score cell carries the URL and the date checked, and a status that says whether the fact was published, partly published, withheld for the call, not found, or could not be verified.
• A fact published only in a machine-readable file at the site root, llms.txt or llms-full.txt, counts at half its band: it is published on the agency's own site, which is what the criteria ask, but not where a creator reading the site would meet it. A human-readable page overrides a contrary machine file.
• Where a fact is published is recorded in the cell, because it changes what a creator actually sees. A term that appears on one acquisition page and nowhere in the main journey is published, and the cell says so. A term that a page builds with JavaScript when a reader clicks is published for a reader and absent for a search engine or a language model, and the cell says that too.
• "Not disclosed as of <date>" is a statement about the agency's publishing on that date, not about its practice. An agency that publishes the fact after the check moves up on the next update.
• Evidence ages, and the site says so rather than hiding it: profiles are re-checked at least monthly, and any cell not re-read within ninety days is marked on the profile as due for re-check.
• Claims that cannot be verified without exposing a creator (a specific creator's earnings, a leak record) are shown on the profile as claims and do not count.
• A score is published when its evidence sheet is complete, and reflects what was publicly available on the date in the cell. The agency is notified with the full scorecard when its profile goes live, and can contest any cell at any time; a published page it links to changes the cell within one business day. Replies are published verbatim. No agency approves its score before publication.

The criteria

1. Commission published

Definition. The commission rate or range is published on the agency's site before any call, with the basis stated (gross, or net after the platform's 20%).

Why it matters. It is the single fact creators most want and most agencies withhold until a sales call.

Scoring. 10 = exact rate or range published with basis stated, on a pricing, services or FAQ page. 5 = published without basis, or only inside a comparison article. 0 = not disclosed, including "disclosed on the call".

Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission rate? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

2. Creator keeps sole login

Definition. Published onboarding, FAQ or terms state that the creator retains sole access to the account credentials, email and two-factor codes.

Why it matters. The account is the business. Whoever holds the login can change payout details or lock the creator out.

Scoring. 10 = creator-only access stated. 5 = shared access disclosed. 0 = agency logs in, or not stated.

Which OnlyFans agencies let the creator keep her login? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

3. Payouts go direct to the creator

Definition. Platform payouts go to the creator's own bank account, never through the agency.

Why it matters. Money that passes through an agency is money the creator has to ask for.

Scoring. 10 = stated. 0 = routed through the agency, or not stated.

Which OnlyFans agencies send payouts straight to the creator? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

4. No minimum term, clear exit

Definition. Minimum term, notice period and renewal are published.

Why it matters. Undisclosed terms, silent renewal and no route out are where creators get trapped. Minimum terms are legal; hidden ones are the problem.

Scoring. 10 = no minimum term, notice 30 days or less, published. 6 = no minimum term stated, notice not stated. 3 = minimum term disclosed with an exit route. 0 = not disclosed.

Which OnlyFans agencies publish no minimum term? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

5. No commission after exit

Definition. Whether any commission continues after the agreement ends is published.

Why it matters. A post-termination percentage on existing subscribers is the clause that costs creators most, and it is almost never on a marketing page.

Scoring. 10 = explicitly none. 5 = tail disclosed with length and basis. 0 = not disclosed.

Which OnlyFans agencies take a commission after you leave? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

6. No upfront cost

Definition. Nothing is payable before the creator earns: no setup fee, retainer or software charge.

Why it matters. Upfront fees shift the risk to the creator before the agency has done anything.

Scoring. 10 = explicitly none. 0 = fees, or not disclosed.

Which OnlyFans agencies charge upfront fees? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

7. Creator owns the content

Definition. Published statement that content created during the agreement belongs to the creator and any license ends with the contract.

Why it matters. A perpetual license lets an agency keep using a creator's material after she leaves.

Scoring. 10 = ownership stated and the agency's license ends with the contract. 5 = ownership stated, license terms kept in a private agreement. 0 = license survives exit, or not stated.

Which OnlyFans agencies say the creator owns her content? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

8. Verifiable legal entity

Definition. Legal name, jurisdiction and address are published and can be checked in a public register.

Why it matters. An agency that exists only as a contact form cannot be held to anything.

Scoring. 10 = legal name, jurisdiction and address published, and the register named or linked. 5 = name and country. 0 = contact form only.

Which OnlyFans agencies publish a verifiable legal entity? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

9. Longevity, documented

Definition. Years operating under this name, supported by the oldest public evidence we can reach, in this order of strength: a company register filing date, the domain registration date, the oldest readable archived copy of the site, or a dated third-party artifact that names the agency (a portfolio piece, a directory entry, press). A predecessor structure counts if it is publicly documented. A founding year stated only on the agency's own site does not count.

Why it matters. Agencies appear and vanish. A record that survives a few years is evidence of a business, not a campaign.

Scoring. 10 = five or more years documented. 7 = three to five. 4 = one to three. 1 = under a year. Scored on the oldest public evidence, never on the agency's own statement.

How long have these OnlyFans agencies actually existed? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

10. Results with a verification route

Definition. Results are shown with a way to check them: payout screenshots published with permission, a results page, a creator reference on request, or a live-dashboard offer.

Why it matters. Every agency claims growth. Few give a creator a way to check the claim before signing.

Scoring. 10 = artifacts plus a verification route. 6 = artifacts without a route. 3 = figures without artifacts. 0 = none.

Which OnlyFans agencies can back up their results? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

11. Says who should not sign

Definition. The site names situations in which a creator should not sign, or a competitor that is the better fit.

Why it matters. It is the best available proxy for whether the rest of the site is straight.

Scoring. 10 = names situations and competitors. 5 = names situations. 0 = none.

Which OnlyFans agencies say who should not sign with them? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

12. Scope of the commission itemized

Definition. What the commission includes is listed, so that add-ons are visible before signing.

Why it matters. "Full service" means nothing until it is itemized.

Scoring. 10 = what the commission includes is itemized and the site states whether anything costs extra. 5 = a list without that statement. 0 = not stated.

What does an OnlyFans agency commission actually cover? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

13. Scale and infrastructure, published

Definition. Team size, roster size, platform coverage and locations as published by the agency.

Why it matters. Size is a real advantage for multi-platform creators and a real disadvantage for creators who want attention. It is scored, and it is scored low on purpose relative to disclosure.

Scoring. 10 = 100+ team or 10+ platforms. 7 = 20+ team or several platforms. 4 = small team, disclosed. 0 = not disclosed.

How big are these OnlyFans agencies? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

14. Content protection included and described

Definition. Leak monitoring and takedowns are included in the commission, and the mechanism is published: monitoring cadence and typical takedown time.

Why it matters. Leaks are the second most common creator fear after account control, and "DMCA" is often an upsell.

Scoring. 10 = included, mechanism and typical takedown time published. 7 = included, mechanism published, no timing. 5 = included, no detail. 0 = extra fee, or not stated.

Which OnlyFans agencies include leak protection, and how? Every scored agency on this criterion, with sources.

The arithmetic

Score = (sum of the fourteen criterion scores) / 14, rounded to one decimal. Ties are broken by the number of criteria at 10, then alphabetically. There is no weighting, no bonus and no manual adjustment; the table on the ranking page is generated from the same data as the profiles, so the two cannot drift apart. The score measures published terms, not service quality; a 0 means the fact is not on the agency's site, was withheld for the call, or scores 0 under the band.

Applied to the current data, these rules produce the ranking on the homepage. The same data is published as ranking.json and ranking.csv.

Robustness of the current order

The same scorecards recomputed under alternative rules, regenerated on every build. The purpose is to show whether the order at the top depends on any single criterion or on how silence is counted. It is not a second methodology; the published rubric in the first row is the only one that produces the ranking.

The two criteria on which the publisher's own agency loses points, scale and longevity, widen its lead when removed. Any agency changes this table by publishing; the changelog records when it does.

What the method cannot see

Service quality, chat team competence, actual revenue outcomes for a given creator, and how an agency behaves when things go wrong. Published terms are a floor, not a guarantee. Read the profile, then the contract, then talk to a creator the agency currently manages.

One evidence source has a blind spot worth naming, because longevity is scored on it. A domain's registration date in the public registry is the date of the current registration, not of the business. A domain that lapsed and was re-registered shows the new date and the earlier years disappear from the record, so the date is a floor and never a ceiling. The publisher's own domain proves it: the registry gives fantasyrise.com a registration date of 9 September 2026, while the agency behind it has a Wyoming filing from 6 February 2024 and a dated public artifact from September 2023. The FantasyRise profile states that domain date itself and scores its longevity on the register filing and the dated third-party record instead, which is the same treatment any agency gets. Where a domain date is the only evidence in a longevity cell, read it as "documented at least this long", and any agency with an earlier register filing, archive capture or dated third-party record can move the cell by sending it.

Changelog

• 11 September 2026, v1.0. First published version: fourteen criteria, equal weights, and the rule that anything an agency does not publish scores zero. Every later change to a band or a weight is dated here.