Comparison · #1 vs #19 · September 2026
FantasyRise vs AT Agency: published terms compared
FantasyRise (#1, 9.1/10, United States): Publishes a 30–60% net commission range, no minimum term, no commission after exit, no upfront cost, and the creator keeps her own login. Five creators on the roster by choice. AT Agency (#19, 1.6/10, location not published): A single-page React site that publishes one term, creator ownership of content in its terms, and nothing else: no commission, no term or notice, no login or payout rule, no legal entity, no location, no figures. Results are first names with rank tiles ("Top 0.05%") and a disclaimer that they are not typical.
FantasyRise ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
FantasyRise: A creator who wants to read the terms before the call, keep her own login, and be one of five rather than one of four hundred. Not for a creator who wants multi-platform scale or a large team behind her.
AT Agency: A creator who is content to learn every term on the strategy call after acceptance. Not for a creator who wants any commercial term, or the company behind the agency, in writing first. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.
Why FantasyRise ranks above AT Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between FantasyRise (9.1/10, #1) and AT Agency (1.6/10, #19) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
FantasyRise scores higher on 13 criteria: Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 0); Says who should not sign (10 vs 0); Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No upfront cost (10 vs 0); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 0); No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Commission published (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (10 vs 5); Content protection included and described (10 vs 5); Longevity, documented (4 vs 0).
AT Agency scores higher on no criterion.
Both score the same on 1 criterion. Net difference: 7.5 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | FantasyRise | AT Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 30–60% of net earnings | Not published; not even a model is named |
| Basis | Net, after OnlyFans' 20% platform fee | Not published |
| Minimum term | None | Not published |
| Notice period | None: "no notice period", "leave any time, effective immediately" | Not published |
| Commission after exit | None | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None | Not published; the terms' liability cap refers to "the amount you have paid us in the three months preceding the claim, or €100" |
| Who holds the login | Creator only, during and after | Not published; "We're in your account every day" |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator's bank account | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator | Creator, in the terms: "You retain full ownership of all content you create" |
| Binding agreement public | Yes. Terms, privacy policy and the six commitments are public documents on the site. | No. No creator agreement is mentioned; the terms cover website use and the application. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | FantasyRise | AT Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No commission after exit | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator owns the content | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Longevity, documented | 4 Partly published Source | 0 Unverifiable, provisional Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 4 Partly published Source | 4 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
FantasyRise profile · AT Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “FantasyRise vs AT Agency: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/fantasyrise-vs-at-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.