Comparison · #1 vs #8 · September 2026
FantasyRise vs Hush Talent: published terms compared
FantasyRise (#1, 9.4/10, United States): Publishes a 30–60% net commission range, no minimum term, no commission after exit, no upfront cost, and the creator keeps her own login. Fourteen creators on the roster, carried by a team of 60+ people. Hush Talent (#8, 4.9/10, United States): A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
FantasyRise ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
FantasyRise: A creator who wants to read the terms before the call, keep her own login, and be one of fourteen rather than one of four hundred. Not for a creator who wants multi-platform scale or a large team behind her.
Hush Talent: A creator who wants a published flat rate on gross revenue and accepts a 90-day first term, including creators below $5,000 a month, since no minimum income applies. Not for a creator who wants to leave at any time from day one, or who needs the payout route and any post-exit commission in writing before a call. Last checked 23 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 23 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 20 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.4/10.
Why FantasyRise ranks above Hush Talent
Ranked on published terms. The gap between FantasyRise (9.4/10, #1) and Hush Talent (4.9/10, #8) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
FantasyRise scores higher on 10 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Content protection included and described (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 3); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5).
Hush Talent scores higher on 1 criterion: Longevity, documented (10 vs 4).
Both score the same on 3 criteria. Net difference: 4.5 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | FantasyRise | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 30–60% of net earnings | 20% for full management; 15% of deal value on brand deals: "Those are the only two rates." The homepage also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call" |
| Basis | Net, after OnlyFans' 20% platform fee | Gross: "20% of gross managed revenue" |
| Minimum term | None | 90-day initial term: "The initial term is 90 days" |
| Notice period | None: "no notice period", "leave any time, effective immediately" | 30 days after the initial term: "After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice" |
| Commission after exit | None | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None | None: "no application fee, no onboarding fee, and no monthly minimum" |
| Who holds the login | Creator only, during and after | Delegated access, as advice in a guide: "A legitimate agency does not need your OnlyFans, Fansly, or social media passwords" |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator's bank account | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator | Creator: "The content itself remains yours, during the agreement and after it ends"; paid casting shoots excepted |
| Binding agreement public | Yes. Terms, privacy policy and the six commitments are public documents on the site. | No. A sample agreement is offered after the strategy call. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | FantasyRise | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 3 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 4 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 7 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
FantasyRise profile · Hush Talent profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “FantasyRise vs Hush Talent: published terms compared”, 23 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/fantasyrise-vs-hush-talent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.