Sub-ranking · from the same data as the main index
The most transparent OnlyFans agencies, measured not claimed
As of 3 November 2026, FantasyRise leads all 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies scored in this index at 9.6/10, ahead of OnModelStudios at 8.1/10, when they are ranked by how much of the six-term core they publish: commission and its basis, minimum term and exit, post-exit commission, who holds the login, where payouts land and who owns the content. FantasyRise also leads the index overall. The list is ordered by the six terms that decide what a creator can lose, then by the full terms score, under methodology v1.1, which scores only what each agency publishes on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Every agency in this market calls itself transparent. This list measures it. Six terms decide what a creator can lose, and each is either on the agency's own website before a sales call or it is not: the commission rate with its basis, the minimum term and how to exit, whether commission continues after exit, who holds the account login, where platform payouts land, and who owns the content afterwards. Each is scored out of ten, so sixty is a perfect score. Twelve of the twenty-one publish none of the six in full, which is the finding this index exists to publish.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
This list is a filter of the main index, not the index itself. The overall #1 on published terms is FantasyRise (9.6/10); the full order of all 21 scored agencies is on the main ranking, scored under the same methodology.
The list
-
1
FantasyRise
Jacksonville, Florida · #1 overall · published-terms score · checked 3 November 2026FantasyRise publishes a 30–60% net commission range, 30–50% on its Growth track from about $5,000 a month, 25% of chat revenue for chat-only management, no minimum term, no commission after exit, no upfront cost, and the creator keeps her own login. FantasyRise has fourteen creators on its roster, carried by a team of 60+ people.
- Commission public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term
- No post-exit commission
- No upfront cost
9.6 -
2
OnModelStudios
Oakland Park, Florida (registered); team in Europe and the Philippines · #2 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1.
- Commission public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
8.1 -
3
Foxy Studios
Baar, canton of Zug · #5 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
- Commission public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.2 -
4
Lumina Connect
Quakenbrück, Lower Saxony · #4 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Lumina Connect publishes the structural terms in plain sentences: the creator keeps the login on her own email and password, platform payouts land in her bank account, no upfront fees, no lock-in, leak removal included. Withholds the commission rate for the call and has no public contract text.
- Commission not public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.2 -
5
SirenCY
Melbourne, Victoria · #7 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026SirenCY publishes a 35% fee with the basis left to the agreement, a register-verified Australian entity, and creator-owned content with a licence that ends at termination. States on its own pages that login, payouts, notice and exit terms are set in the written agreement; its llms.txt claims otherwise.
- Commission partly
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront partly stated
5.4 -
6
Hush Talent
Los Angeles, California (registered service address); offices in Greenwich, Connecticut and New York · #8 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
- Commission public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term partly stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
4.9 -
7
Aruna Talent
United States · #3 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Aruna Talent publishes no commission rate, only that its share is charged on net and set on the discovery call; publishes no payout route and no post-exit clause; states the creator's own logins in its llms.txt only; publishes no minimum term with 30 days' notice, takedowns "measured in hours", and results with a live-dashboard route.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.4 -
8
Bunny Agency
Sheridan, Wyoming (registered); operations stated as Florida, studios in six cities · #6 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Publishes 112+ team members and 400+ creators (own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.
- Commission partly
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.0 -
9
TDM Agency
Lichfield, Staffordshire (site); registered office Walsall · #9 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026TDM Agency publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account.
- Commission partly
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
4.1 -
10
Louna's Models
Newark, Delaware (footer address); French-speaking market · #10 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026An all-female, French-oriented agency in nine languages that publishes no upfront fees, no long-term contract and a clear account-return promise, but no commission rate (only the industry's 30–50%), no legal entity and no terms; the "Terms Conditions" link is a 404 and the privacy policy is WordPress sample text.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
3.8 -
11
TopStar Management
Not published ("serving creators worldwide"; a Croatian sister site) · #11 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026TopStar Management publishes commission-only with zero upfront fees, no lock-in contract with no penalties or holdback on exit, and creator ownership of everything created, all in the homepage FAQ; withholds the percentage for the consultation and names no company, address or country anywhere.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
3.4 -
12
Seluna
Not published; "Swiss" marketing, US LLC without a named state · #16 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A boutique one-page site that publishes an agreement either side can end at any time, limited account access and creator ownership of content, and withholds the rate ("explained transparently before we begin"). Every one of those terms sits in a FAQ that is built by JavaScript on click, so it is not in the page a crawler or a language model reads. Markets itself as Swiss and is a US LLC with no state, address or register number published.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
2.7 -
13
FansHub
Surbiton, Greater London (website); registered office in Shoeburyness, Essex · #12 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026FansHub publishes a 14-day rolling agreement ("free to leave at any time") and a verifiable UK company whose directors match the two founders named on the site. Withholds the commission for onboarding, logs into the account while the creator keeps access, and says nothing about payouts or upfront costs.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
3.4 -
14
AROA Agency
Miami, Florida (footer address); chatters work on Eastern European time · #15 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026AROA Agency promises a free exit on every page ("cancel anytime, zero penalties", "if no growth in 30 days, you're free to go") and withholds the commission for the call ("multiple financial options, such as a revenue split"). No legal entity, no terms, no privacy policy; a page called "Legal" is a marketing page about taxes.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
2.9 -
15
XCreatorMgmt
San Francisco (privacy-policy address, unverified) · #13 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026XCreatorMgmt publishes a free exit ("you can walk in 30 days. No long-term contracts."), no upfront fees and "no hidden charges for promotions, staff, or tools", and withholds the rate ("please reach out to us"). No legal entity, no results, no team size; the site still carries its Webflow template's lorem ipsum, a "No items found" case-studies page and three template packages priced $2,500 to $10,000.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.9 -
16
VSM (Vanguard Star Management)
United States (no address published) · #14 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A US agency for creators with an existing Instagram, TikTok or X following, typically 10,000 or more. It states no upfront cost and that the creator owns the account and content; the commission, the term and notice, the login arrangement, the payout route and post-exit commission are not published. Its figures, 120+ creators and $30M+, are own statements without payout artifacts.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.9 -
17
Vantage Agency
Not published: no address, no country, no jurisdiction anywhere on the site · #17 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A one-page site for a deliberately private agency: it publishes a 30–50% revenue share and "nothing upfront", and then stops. No login rule, no payout route, no minimum term, no notice, no post-exit commission, no content ownership, no terms, no privacy policy, no legal entity, no country. Results are three anonymous testimonials and three aggregate figures with no artifact behind them.
- Commission partly
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.6 -
18
Creators Inc.
Los Angeles content house, presence in Miami · #18 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Creators Inc. sells on celebrity references and press (Shannon Elizabeth, Donna Mills, Larsa Pippen), a named founder and a physical content house, and publishes not one commercial term: commission, basis, term, notice, login and payouts are all "explained before you decide". Its own comparison page ranks it first and demands from every agency exactly the disclosures it does not make.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
2.4 -
19
Lush Management
"Headquartered in the UK", no town · #19 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Lush Management publishes that the creator keeps full access to her account and that the agency is paid only when she earns, with a contract "on our costs" set up after the application. No rate, no term, no legal entity, no privacy policy or terms, and a homepage whose success stories are unfilled template placeholders.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.4 -
20
AT Agency
Not published (US phone number, euro amounts in the terms) · #21 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A single-page React site that publishes one term, creator ownership of content in its terms, and nothing else: no commission, no term or notice, no login or payout rule, no legal entity, no location, no figures. Results are first names with rank tiles ("Top 0.05%") and a disclaimer that they are not typical.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
1.6 -
21
Teasy Agency
Los Angeles and Las Vegas · #20 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Teasy Agency publishes no commission, no contract terms and no legal entity. Its own FAQ asks "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers without a number. The one published creator term is "zero startup fees". Strong trade-show presence and a published 5% referral program.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.3
The same list as a table, with the two criteria that define it
| # | Agency | Score | Commission public | Minimum term |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FantasyRise #1 overall | 9.6 | 10/10 How-we-work page: "30% to 60% of net, published before any call. Net means after OnlyFans takes its own 20%, s… | 10/10 Homepage banner: "no notice period, leave any time". Legitimacy page: "No minimum term. No notice period, you … |
| 2 | OnModelStudios #2 overall | 8.1 | 10/10 FAQ, "How much of my revenue do you take?": "Our commission ranges from 25% to 55% of your earnings after plat… | 10/10 FAQ, "Is there a lock-in, and how do I leave?": "No minimum term and no exit penalties. You can end management… |
| 3 | Foxy Studios #5 overall | 6.2 | 10/10 Services page: "Creators keep 55% of their earnings at Foxy Studios - a transparent 55/45 split in the creator… | 10/10 Terms: "We operate on a month-to-month basis. Either party may terminate the management agreement with 30 days… |
| 4 | Lumina Connect #4 overall | 6.2 | 0/10 Homepage FAQ, "What commission do you take?": "That depends on the setup - and anyone who quotes you a percent… | 6/10 No minimum term. Homepage: "No bonding contracts. No lock-in, no exit penalties. We keep creators through resu… |
| 5 | SirenCY #7 overall | 5.4 | 5/10 Published as a single figure, basis withheld. Creators page: "SirenCY agency fee 35% Calculation basis Defined… | 6/10 llms.txt: "Contracts are month-to-month with no lock-in; creators retain 100% account ownership." llms-full.tx… |
| 6 | Hush Talent #8 overall | 4.9 | 10/10 Pricing page: "20% of gross managed revenue for full management, and 15% of deal value on brand deals we sourc… | 3/10 Pricing page: "The initial term is 90 days. After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice, and t… |
| 7 | Aruna Talent #3 overall | 6.4 | 0/10 Not published. llms.txt gives only the basis: "Aruna's share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fe… | 10/10 Now on the pages written for people. Homepage: "No minimum term. Leave on 30 days' written notice with no exit… |
| 8 | Bunny Agency #6 overall | 6.0 | 5/10 Published without a basis. Contract page: "Our commission is published: 25%–50%, scaling with how much of the … | 6/10 "No upfront fees, no long-term lock-in", "you are free to leave at any time", "Cancel Anytime". Minimum term, … |
| 9 | TDM Agency #9 overall | 4.1 | 5/10 No pricing page (/pricing/ returns 404). The homepage says "We typically work on a revenue-share basis, meanin… | 6/10 The exit terms appear on one acquisition page only. The trans-creator landing page says "Join our agency risk-… |
| 10 | Louna's Models #10 overall | 3.8 | 0/10 Homepage FAQ, "How much does an OnlyFans agency charge?": "Most OnlyFans agencies charge between 30% and 50% o… | 6/10 FAQ: "There are no upfront fees, no setup costs, and no long-term contracts." The same sentence appears in eve… |
| 11 | TopStar Management #11 overall | 3.4 | 0/10 Homepage FAQ, "How much do you charge?": "TopStar MGMT works entirely on commission, a percentage of the reven… | 6/10 FAQ, "Do I have to sign a long-term contract?": "No. TopStar MGMT does not use lock-in contracts ... If you de… |
| 12 | Seluna #16 overall | 2.7 | 0/10 FAQ, "How much does your management service cost?": "We work on a performance-based revenue-share model, meani… | 6/10 FAQ, "Is there a contract or long-term commitment?": "Our agreement can be terminated at any time by either si… |
| 13 | FansHub #12 overall | 3.4 | 0/10 Homepage FAQ, "How much does FansHub charge?": "Our pricing is a revenue-share structure and tailored to each … | 10/10 Homepage FAQ, "Does FansHub use contracts?": "FansHub does not lock creators into long-term contracts. We oper… |
| 14 | AROA Agency #15 overall | 2.9 | 0/10 Not published. Homepage process, step 2 "Financial Options": "Based on our initial consultation, we will evalu… | 6/10 No minimum term, stated repeatedly: "No hidden clauses - cancel anytime, zero penalties.", "No Long-Term Contr… |
| 15 | XCreatorMgmt #13 overall | 2.9 | 0/10 Homepage FAQ, "How much in percentage you take from OnlyFans Creators?": "based on different factors. If you w… | 6/10 Homepage and trans page: "We'll outperform your current agency or you can walk in 30 days. No long-term contra… |
| 16 | VSM (Vanguard Star Management) #14 overall | 2.9 | 0/10 Not published. The FAQ says "VSM works on a revenue-share model" without a figure; a guide on the site says "M… | 0/10 Not published. Terms: "Any working relationship is governed by a separate written agreement." No minimum term … |
| 17 | Vantage Agency #17 overall | 2.6 | 5/10 Published as a range, twice, in both language versions. Offer card 01: "Revenue share, not salary. Transparent… | 0/10 Not found. No minimum term, no notice period, no renewal rule and no exclusivity rule for its own contract. Th… |
| 18 | Creators Inc. #18 overall | 2.4 | 0/10 Management FAQ, "How much does OnlyFans management cost?": "If there may be a fit, the team explains the fee o… | 0/10 Not published. The comparison page promises "The full contract up front: term, exclusivity, renewal, tail comm… |
| 19 | Lush Management #19 overall | 2.4 | 0/10 Comparison table, in the column for Lush Management: "Performance-focused management-No payment unless you ear… | 0/10 Not published. A contract exists ("we set up a contract on our costs"); term, notice and renewal are stated no… |
| 20 | AT Agency #21 overall | 1.6 | 0/10 No rate, range or model anywhere in the site bundle. The application form asks for current monthly revenue in … | 0/10 No minimum term, notice period, renewal rule or contract is mentioned. The FAQ describes only the start: "we b… |
| 21 | Teasy Agency #20 overall | 2.3 | 0/10 The homepage FAQ asks "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers: "Teasy Agency normally works on a commi… | 0/10 No minimum term, notice period or renewal rule published. The comparison table says only: "Contracts are tailo… |
Ordered by published scale, then by score. Evidence and dates on each profile. Main ranking · Methodology
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “The Most Transparent OnlyFans Agencies (2026)”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/best/most-transparent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.