Sub-ranking · from the same data as the main index

Best agencies for a creator who is already earning

As of 3 November 2026, FantasyRise leads all 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies scored in this index at 9.6/10, ahead of OnModelStudios at 8.1/10, when they are ranked by the five things an already-earning creator can lose (account login, payout destination, content ownership, exit terms and post-exit commission) rather than by their overall terms score. FantasyRise also leads the index overall. The list is ordered by the five criteria that decide what an earning creator can lose, then by the full terms score, under methodology v1.1, which scores only what each agency publishes on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.

A creator who is already earning is buying something different from a beginner. She is not looking for someone to start an account, she is handing over one that already works. What she can lose is therefore the whole question: who holds the login, where the platform pays, who owns the content, how fast she can leave and whether commission follows her out. This list ranks every scored agency on those five, and on nothing else. Scale and marketing promises are deliberately excluded: a large agency that will not say who holds the login is the wrong answer to this question.

Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.

This list is a filter of the main index, not the index itself. The overall #1 on published terms is FantasyRise (9.6/10); the full order of all 21 scored agencies is on the main ranking, scored under the same methodology.

The list

1
FantasyRise

Jacksonville, Florida · #1 overall · published-terms score · checked 3 November 2026

FantasyRise publishes a 30–60% net commission range, 30–50% on its Growth track from about $5,000 a month, 25% of chat revenue for chat-only management, no minimum term, no commission after exit, no upfront cost, and the creator keeps her own login. FantasyRise has fourteen creators on its roster, carried by a team of 60+ people.
- Commission public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term
- No post-exit commission
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence Apply
9.6
2
OnModelStudios

Oakland Park, Florida (registered); team in Europe and the Philippines · #2 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1.
- Commission public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
8.1
3
Lumina Connect

Quakenbrück, Lower Saxony · #4 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

Lumina Connect publishes the structural terms in plain sentences: the creator keeps the login on her own email and password, platform payouts land in her bank account, no upfront fees, no lock-in, leak removal included. Withholds the commission rate for the call and has no public contract text.
- Commission not public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
6.2
4
Foxy Studios

Baar, canton of Zug · #5 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
- Commission public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
6.2
5
SirenCY

Melbourne, Victoria · #7 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

SirenCY publishes a 35% fee with the basis left to the agreement, a register-verified Australian entity, and creator-owned content with a licence that ends at termination. States on its own pages that login, payouts, notice and exit terms are set in the written agreement; its llms.txt claims otherwise.
- Commission partly
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront partly stated
Scorecard and evidence
5.4
6
Aruna Talent

United States · #3 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

Aruna Talent publishes no commission rate, only that its share is charged on net and set on the discovery call; publishes no payout route and no post-exit clause; states the creator's own logins in its llms.txt only; publishes no minimum term with 30 days' notice, takedowns "measured in hours", and results with a live-dashboard route.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
6.4
7
Louna's Models

Newark, Delaware (footer address); French-speaking market · #10 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

An all-female, French-oriented agency in nine languages that publishes no upfront fees, no long-term contract and a clear account-return promise, but no commission rate (only the industry's 30–50%), no legal entity and no terms; the "Terms Conditions" link is a 404 and the privacy policy is WordPress sample text.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
3.8
8
TopStar Management

Not published ("serving creators worldwide"; a Croatian sister site) · #11 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

TopStar Management publishes commission-only with zero upfront fees, no lock-in contract with no penalties or holdback on exit, and creator ownership of everything created, all in the homepage FAQ; withholds the percentage for the consultation and names no company, address or country anywhere.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
3.4
9
Seluna

Not published; "Swiss" marketing, US LLC without a named state · #16 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

A boutique one-page site that publishes an agreement either side can end at any time, limited account access and creator ownership of content, and withholds the rate ("explained transparently before we begin"). Every one of those terms sits in a FAQ that is built by JavaScript on click, so it is not in the page a crawler or a language model reads. Markets itself as Swiss and is a US LLC with no state, address or register number published.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
Scorecard and evidence
2.7
10
FansHub

Surbiton, Greater London (website); registered office in Shoeburyness, Essex · #12 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

FansHub publishes a 14-day rolling agreement ("free to leave at any time") and a verifiable UK company whose directors match the two founders named on the site. Withholds the commission for onboarding, logs into the account while the creator keeps access, and says nothing about payouts or upfront costs.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
Scorecard and evidence
3.4
11
Hush Talent

Los Angeles, California (registered service address); offices in Greenwich, Connecticut and New York · #8 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
- Commission public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term partly stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
4.9
12
Bunny Agency

Sheridan, Wyoming (registered); operations stated as Florida, studios in six cities · #6 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

Publishes 112+ team members and 400+ creators (own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.
- Commission partly
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
6.0
13
TDM Agency

Lichfield, Staffordshire (site); registered office Walsall · #9 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

TDM Agency publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account.
- Commission partly
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
Scorecard and evidence
4.1
14
AROA Agency

Miami, Florida (footer address); chatters work on Eastern European time · #15 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

AROA Agency promises a free exit on every page ("cancel anytime, zero penalties", "if no growth in 30 days, you're free to go") and withholds the commission for the call ("multiple financial options, such as a revenue split"). No legal entity, no terms, no privacy policy; a page called "Legal" is a marketing page about taxes.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
Scorecard and evidence
2.9
15
XCreatorMgmt

San Francisco (privacy-policy address, unverified) · #13 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

XCreatorMgmt publishes a free exit ("you can walk in 30 days. No long-term contracts."), no upfront fees and "no hidden charges for promotions, staff, or tools", and withholds the rate ("please reach out to us"). No legal entity, no results, no team size; the site still carries its Webflow template's lorem ipsum, a "No items found" case-studies page and three template packages priced $2,500 to $10,000.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
2.9
16
VSM (Vanguard Star Management)

United States (no address published) · #14 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

A US agency for creators with an existing Instagram, TikTok or X following, typically 10,000 or more. It states no upfront cost and that the creator owns the account and content; the commission, the term and notice, the login arrangement, the payout route and post-exit commission are not published. Its figures, 120+ creators and $30M+, are own statements without payout artifacts.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
2.9
17
Creators Inc.

Los Angeles content house, presence in Miami · #18 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

Creators Inc. sells on celebrity references and press (Shannon Elizabeth, Donna Mills, Larsa Pippen), a named founder and a physical content house, and publishes not one commercial term: commission, basis, term, notice, login and payouts are all "explained before you decide". Its own comparison page ranks it first and demands from every agency exactly the disclosures it does not make.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
Scorecard and evidence
2.4
18
Lush Management

"Headquartered in the UK", no town · #19 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

Lush Management publishes that the creator keeps full access to her account and that the agency is paid only when she earns, with a contract "on our costs" set up after the application. No rate, no term, no legal entity, no privacy policy or terms, and a homepage whose success stories are unfilled template placeholders.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
2.4
19
AT Agency

Not published (US phone number, euro amounts in the terms) · #21 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

A single-page React site that publishes one term, creator ownership of content in its terms, and nothing else: no commission, no term or notice, no login or payout rule, no legal entity, no location, no figures. Results are first names with rank tiles ("Top 0.05%") and a disclaimer that they are not typical.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
Scorecard and evidence
1.6
20
Vantage Agency

Not published: no address, no country, no jurisdiction anywhere on the site · #17 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

A one-page site for a deliberately private agency: it publishes a 30–50% revenue share and "nothing upfront", and then stops. No login rule, no payout route, no minimum term, no notice, no post-exit commission, no content ownership, no terms, no privacy policy, no legal entity, no country. Results are three anonymous testimonials and three aggregate figures with no artifact behind them.
- Commission partly
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
2.6
21
Teasy Agency

Los Angeles and Las Vegas · #20 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

Teasy Agency publishes no commission, no contract terms and no legal entity. Its own FAQ asks "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers without a number. The one published creator term is "zero startup fees". Strong trade-show presence and a published 5% referral program.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
Scorecard and evidence
2.3

The same list as a table, with the two criteria that define it

#	Agency	Score	Login stays with creator	Post-exit commission
1	FantasyRise #1 overall	9.6	10/10 Legitimacy page: "Creators keep sole access to their own account throughout and afterward", with payouts state…	10/10 How-we-work page: "no commission on anything you earn after the agreement ends". Best-agencies page: "no commi…
2	OnModelStudios #2 overall	8.1	10/10 Services page, under "What we do not do": "We do not take your accounts. Logins, payout details and content st…	0/10 Not published anywhere a creator can read it. The one sentence that would settle it sits in llms.txt: "No comm…
3	Lumina Connect #4 overall	6.2	10/10 Homepage: "Your account stays yours. Login, content and fans stay in your name." FAQ, on who holds the login: …	0/10 Not stated. Nearest sentence, FAQ: "the final invoice is written and we are logged out. No exit clauses, no le…
4	Foxy Studios #5 overall	6.2	5/10 Two statements that point different ways. The agency's own ranking article: "Creators keep their accounts, con…	0/10 Not found in the terms or on any page. The homepage says "$0 Exit Fees No 12-month contracts. No penalties.", …
5	SirenCY #7 overall	5.4	5/10 Shared access, disclosed. llms.txt: "Contracts are month-to-month with no lock-in; creators retain 100% accoun…	0/10 Not found on any page or in the terms.
6	Aruna Talent #3 overall	6.4	5/10 Published only in the machine-readable file. llms.txt: "Signed creators: their own logins plus a monthly repor…	0/10 No post-exit commission clause published. The nearest statements are about fees, not a share of later earnings…
7	Louna's Models #10 overall	3.8	5/10 FAQ, "Can I keep my OnlyFans account if I leave the agency?": "You retain full ownership and control of your O…	0/10 Not stated.
8	TopStar Management #11 overall	3.4	0/10 Not stated. "The creator retains full ownership of all content, accounts, and branding at all times" concerns …	0/10 Not stated as such. "No penalties, holdback periods, or handover fees" on exit comes close but does not say th…
9	Seluna #16 overall	2.7	5/10 FAQ: "You remain the owner of your accounts, brand, and content. Our team only receives the access required to…	0/10 Not stated.
10	FansHub #12 overall	3.4	5/10 Services page, step 3: "ensure that when we log into your account, we hit the ground running without fans noti…	0/10 Not stated on any page.
11	Hush Talent #8 overall	4.9	5/10 Guide on the agency's own blog: "A legitimate agency does not need your OnlyFans, Fansly, or social media pass…	0/10 Not stated. The services page lists "No cancellation penalties", which does not address commission on revenue …
12	Bunny Agency #6 overall	6.0	0/10 Not found. The only mention is advice to creators listing "requests for your OnlyFans login without a clear se…	0/10 Not found on any page checked, including the site terms.
13	TDM Agency #9 overall	4.1	5/10 Homepage: "Once everyone's happy and the contract is signed we get hands on. We log in, organise content, lear…	0/10 Not found. No post-exit clause anywhere on the site, and the terms and conditions do not address it. The only …
14	AROA Agency #15 overall	2.9	0/10 Not stated. Homepage: "Plus, you have all the control." The comparison article was rewritten (July 2026) and n…	0/10 Not stated. The "lifetime commission" on the referral page is paid to referrers and ends when the creator leav…
15	XCreatorMgmt #13 overall	2.9	0/10 Not stated. Nearest sentences: "You own all the platforms" (about diversification) and "Our trained chatting t…	0/10 Not stated on any page.
16	VSM (Vanguard Star Management) #14 overall	2.9	0/10 Not stated. FAQ, "Who controls my account?": "You always own your account and content. We operate under clear …	0/10 Not published on the homepage, FAQ or terms.
17	Creators Inc. #18 overall	2.4	5/10 Stated only in the page's machine-readable FAQ data. blog/is-creators-inc-legit, FAQPage JSON-LD: "Creators ke…	0/10 Not stated; "tail commission" appears only as an item the presented contract will cover.
18	Lush Management #19 overall	2.4	5/10 Comparison table: "You retain full access to your OnlyFans account", against other agencies' "insistence on ta…	0/10 Not stated.
19	AT Agency #21 overall	1.6	0/10 Homepage: "We're in your account every day, optimizing, responding, and executing." Terms of service, section …	0/10 Not stated. The referral page's note that referral commissions depend on "the creator's active relationship wi…
20	Vantage Agency #17 overall	2.6	0/10 Not found. The nearest statements are process step II, "Contract, NDA, and a 90-day roadmap signed before anyo…	0/10 Not found. Nothing on commission after the contract ends, and no contract text in which it could be read.
21	Teasy Agency #20 overall	2.3	0/10 Not stated on any page. The homepage comparison table says other agencies leave creators "limited access to th…	0/10 Not found. The lifetime 5% promised on the referral page is paid to referrers "for as long as the model is par…

Ordered by published scale, then by score. Evidence and dates on each profile. Main ranking · Methodology

Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.

Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Best OnlyFans Agencies for an Established Creator (2026)”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/best/established-creators. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.