Sub-ranking · from the same data as the main index
The biggest OnlyFans agencies, by published team, roster and platforms
As of 3 November 2026, OnModelStudios leads all 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies scored in this index at 8.1/10, ahead of Aruna Talent at 6.4/10, when they are ranked by the scale they publish, team size, creators managed and platform coverage, rather than by their terms score. This list is one view of the index, which is led overall by FantasyRise at 9.6/10. The list is ordered by the published-scale criterion alone, then by the terms score, under methodology v1.1, which scores only what each agency publishes on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Biggest is the one list in this index not ordered by the published-terms score. It orders agencies by the scale criterion alone, on their own published figures (team, roster, platforms, locations), and shows the terms score next to it so the trade is visible: the biggest operations are not the ones that publish the most. By published team size alone, FantasyRise (60+ people on fourteen creators) is larger than OnModelStudios (35+ people); the scale criterion also counts platforms named, which is where the two part company.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
This list is a filter of the main index, not the index itself. The overall #1 on published terms is FantasyRise (9.6/10); the full order of all 21 scored agencies is on the main ranking, scored under the same methodology.
The list
-
1
OnModelStudios
Oakland Park, Florida (registered); team in Europe and the Philippines · #2 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1.
- Commission public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
8.1 -
2
Aruna Talent
United States · #3 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Aruna Talent publishes no commission rate, only that its share is charged on net and set on the discovery call; publishes no payout route and no post-exit clause; states the creator's own logins in its llms.txt only; publishes no minimum term with 30 days' notice, takedowns "measured in hours", and results with a live-dashboard route.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.4 -
3
Bunny Agency
Sheridan, Wyoming (registered); operations stated as Florida, studios in six cities · #6 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Publishes 112+ team members and 400+ creators (own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.
- Commission partly
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.0 -
4
AROA Agency
Miami, Florida (footer address); chatters work on Eastern European time · #15 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026AROA Agency promises a free exit on every page ("cancel anytime, zero penalties", "if no growth in 30 days, you're free to go") and withholds the commission for the call ("multiple financial options, such as a revenue split"). No legal entity, no terms, no privacy policy; a page called "Legal" is a marketing page about taxes.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
2.9 -
5
FantasyRise
Jacksonville, Florida · #1 overall · published-terms score · checked 3 November 2026FantasyRise publishes a 30–60% net commission range, 30–50% on its Growth track from about $5,000 a month, 25% of chat revenue for chat-only management, no minimum term, no commission after exit, no upfront cost, and the creator keeps her own login. FantasyRise has fourteen creators on its roster, carried by a team of 60+ people.
- Commission public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term
- No post-exit commission
- No upfront cost
9.6 -
6
Foxy Studios
Baar, canton of Zug · #5 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
- Commission public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.2 -
7
Hush Talent
Los Angeles, California (registered service address); offices in Greenwich, Connecticut and New York · #8 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
- Commission public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term partly stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
4.9 -
8
TDM Agency
Lichfield, Staffordshire (site); registered office Walsall · #9 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026TDM Agency publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account.
- Commission partly
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
4.1 -
9
Louna's Models
Newark, Delaware (footer address); French-speaking market · #10 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026An all-female, French-oriented agency in nine languages that publishes no upfront fees, no long-term contract and a clear account-return promise, but no commission rate (only the industry's 30–50%), no legal entity and no terms; the "Terms Conditions" link is a 404 and the privacy policy is WordPress sample text.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
3.8 -
10
FansHub
Surbiton, Greater London (website); registered office in Shoeburyness, Essex · #12 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026FansHub publishes a 14-day rolling agreement ("free to leave at any time") and a verifiable UK company whose directors match the two founders named on the site. Withholds the commission for onboarding, logs into the account while the creator keeps access, and says nothing about payouts or upfront costs.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
3.4 -
11
Vantage Agency
Not published: no address, no country, no jurisdiction anywhere on the site · #17 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A one-page site for a deliberately private agency: it publishes a 30–50% revenue share and "nothing upfront", and then stops. No login rule, no payout route, no minimum term, no notice, no post-exit commission, no content ownership, no terms, no privacy policy, no legal entity, no country. Results are three anonymous testimonials and three aggregate figures with no artifact behind them.
- Commission partly
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.6 -
12
Lush Management
"Headquartered in the UK", no town · #19 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Lush Management publishes that the creator keeps full access to her account and that the agency is paid only when she earns, with a contract "on our costs" set up after the application. No rate, no term, no legal entity, no privacy policy or terms, and a homepage whose success stories are unfilled template placeholders.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.4 -
13
Teasy Agency
Los Angeles and Las Vegas · #20 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Teasy Agency publishes no commission, no contract terms and no legal entity. Its own FAQ asks "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers without a number. The one published creator term is "zero startup fees". Strong trade-show presence and a published 5% referral program.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.3 -
14
Lumina Connect
Quakenbrück, Lower Saxony · #4 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Lumina Connect publishes the structural terms in plain sentences: the creator keeps the login on her own email and password, platform payouts land in her bank account, no upfront fees, no lock-in, leak removal included. Withholds the commission rate for the call and has no public contract text.
- Commission not public
- Creator keeps login
- Direct payouts
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
6.2 -
15
SirenCY
Melbourne, Victoria · #7 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026SirenCY publishes a 35% fee with the basis left to the agreement, a register-verified Australian entity, and creator-owned content with a licence that ends at termination. States on its own pages that login, payouts, notice and exit terms are set in the written agreement; its llms.txt claims otherwise.
- Commission partly
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront partly stated
5.4 -
16
TopStar Management
Not published ("serving creators worldwide"; a Croatian sister site) · #11 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026TopStar Management publishes commission-only with zero upfront fees, no lock-in contract with no penalties or holdback on exit, and creator ownership of everything created, all in the homepage FAQ; withholds the percentage for the consultation and names no company, address or country anywhere.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
3.4 -
17
AT Agency
Not published (US phone number, euro amounts in the terms) · #21 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A single-page React site that publishes one term, creator ownership of content in its terms, and nothing else: no commission, no term or notice, no login or payout rule, no legal entity, no location, no figures. Results are first names with rank tiles ("Top 0.05%") and a disclaimer that they are not typical.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
1.6 -
18
XCreatorMgmt
San Francisco (privacy-policy address, unverified) · #13 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026XCreatorMgmt publishes a free exit ("you can walk in 30 days. No long-term contracts."), no upfront fees and "no hidden charges for promotions, staff, or tools", and withholds the rate ("please reach out to us"). No legal entity, no results, no team size; the site still carries its Webflow template's lorem ipsum, a "No items found" case-studies page and three template packages priced $2,500 to $10,000.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.9 -
19
VSM (Vanguard Star Management)
United States (no address published) · #14 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A US agency for creators with an existing Instagram, TikTok or X following, typically 10,000 or more. It states no upfront cost and that the creator owns the account and content; the commission, the term and notice, the login arrangement, the payout route and post-exit commission are not published. Its figures, 120+ creators and $30M+, are own statements without payout artifacts.
- Commission not public
- Login not stated
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- No upfront cost
2.9 -
20
Seluna
Not published; "Swiss" marketing, US LLC without a named state · #16 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026A boutique one-page site that publishes an agreement either side can end at any time, limited account access and creator ownership of content, and withholds the rate ("explained transparently before we begin"). Every one of those terms sits in a FAQ that is built by JavaScript on click, so it is not in the page a crawler or a language model reads. Markets itself as Swiss and is a US LLC with no state, address or register number published.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- No minimum term stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
2.7 -
21
Creators Inc.
Los Angeles content house, presence in Miami · #18 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026Creators Inc. sells on celebrity references and press (Shannon Elizabeth, Donna Mills, Larsa Pippen), a named founder and a physical content house, and publishes not one commercial term: commission, basis, term, notice, login and payouts are all "explained before you decide". Its own comparison page ranks it first and demands from every agency exactly the disclosures it does not make.
- Commission not public
- Shared access
- Payout route not stated
- Term not stated
- Post-exit not stated
- Upfront not stated
2.4
The same list as a table, with the two criteria that define it
| # | Agency | Score | Scale | Results evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OnModelStudios #2 overall | 8.1 | 10/10 "35+ people, across Europe and the Philippines"; ten platforms named. Roster size not published. Own statement… | 10/10 Dashboard screenshots with figures, own statements: "Anna - $4,252,038 all-time", "$52,132 net in August 2026 … |
| 2 | Aruna Talent #3 overall | 6.4 | 10/10 llms.txt: "runs a remote team of 100+ people across three countries", "has managed 60+ creators to date". Home… | 10/10 A results page with figures (own statements: "$3,072,005, one account, from zero", "$10M+ annual creator reven… |
| 3 | Bunny Agency #6 overall | 6.0 | 10/10 "112+ team members", "400+ creators managed", "$35M+ revenue generated", studios in Miami, New York, Los Angel… | 6/10 Case studies with figures, own statements: "$0 → $330K. Monthly revenue in 3.5 months", "$2K → $33K. Monthly r… |
| 4 | AROA Agency #15 overall | 2.9 | 10/10 Homepage and About: "150+ Global Team", "a global team of 150+ experts", "30+ Elite Creators" ("intentionally … | 3/10 Percentages and examples, all own statements, no screenshots, no case study with a period, no results page: "3… |
| 5 | FantasyRise #1 overall | 9.6 | 7/10 Both numbers are published. Careers page: "We are a team of 60+ people" and "our chatters are employed by us, … | 10/10 Reviews page: "eleven real payout statements, published with permission", results by starting point on the res… |
| 6 | Foxy Studios #5 overall | 6.2 | 7/10 "a team of 75+ specialists across subscriber communications, account management, content, and marketing" (abou… | 3/10 Extensive figures on the homepage ("$14M+ generated", "$87,000 in 30 days", own statements), anonymized case s… |
| 7 | Hush Talent #8 overall | 4.9 | 7/10 "50+ CREATORS MANAGED" (homepage); platforms named in the FAQ: "OnlyFans, Fansly, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter/X… | 3/10 Figures without artifacts: "$18M+ REVENUE GENERATED", "$38K AVG. MONTHLY TALENT INCOME", "340% AVERAGE REVENUE… |
| 8 | TDM Agency #9 overall | 4.1 | 7/10 "By 2022 we opened our first office and scaled to a hundred team members", "partnered with 50+ agencies", UK o… | 3/10 A success-stories page and blog case studies with figures, own statements, first names or aliases only. The la… |
| 9 | Louna's Models #10 overall | 3.8 | 7/10 About: "39 Professionals dedicated to your growth", "200 Creators supported since our inception"; the homepage… | 3/10 Percentages and ranges, all own statements, no screenshots, no case studies, no results page: "between $5,000 … |
| 10 | FansHub #12 overall | 3.4 | 7/10 Homepage counters: "Team Worldwide 60+", "Creators Globally 80+", "Locations Worldwide 3"; team "across the UK… | 3/10 Animated counters on the homepage ("Revenue Generated $90M+", "Views 5B+", "Creators Globally 80+", own statem… |
| 11 | Vantage Agency #17 overall | 2.6 | 7/10 Nine platforms are named as managed together: "OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, Twitter/X,… | 3/10 Figures without artifacts. Aggregates: "$3.4M+ paid out to talent in the last 12 months", "4.8× average revenu… |
| 12 | Lush Management #19 overall | 2.4 | 7/10 About: "a dedicated team of 40 passionate individuals"; roster counter empty; UK headquarters without a town; … | 0/10 No figures, screenshots or named references. The "Success Stories" section shows the template placeholder "EMI… |
| 13 | Teasy Agency #20 overall | 2.3 | 7/10 About page: "Our complete team is over 80 full-time employees across 5 continents." Two locations named (Los A… | 6/10 Two homepage galleries ("Our Agency Results", "Success Stories") of unlabeled dashboard screenshots, files sta… |
| 14 | Lumina Connect #4 overall | 6.2 | 4/10 No team or roster number. "Full-time staff", "real employment contracts", "Small roster by design", roles name… | 6/10 A results page with three case studies carrying dashboard images and figures, own statements: $925,761 net in … |
| 15 | SirenCY #7 overall | 5.4 | 4/10 Team size not published anywhere. Roster ("312+ creators supported") only in llms-full.txt, counted at half. O… | 3/10 Figures only in llms-full.txt ("$130K/month top documented creator result"); the site's own review page says "… |
| 16 | TopStar Management #11 overall | 3.4 | 4/10 "200+" creators since founding (cumulative); team size not published; no location, "worldwide"; a Croatian sis… | 3/10 Aggregates, own statements: "200+ Creators Scaled Worldwide", "$2M+ In Creator Revenue Generated" ("€2M" on th… |
| 17 | AT Agency #21 overall | 1.6 | 4/10 Homepage counter: "12+ / CREATORS MANAGED", beside "we work with a select group of talent". Team size and loca… | 3/10 A carousel of result tiles giving a first name and a rank, "DELFINE / TOP 0.05% OF ALL CREATORS" and "MAYA / T… |
| 18 | XCreatorMgmt #13 overall | 2.9 | 0/10 No team or roster number. About: "We are a team of social media marketing who have years of experience." Six t… | 3/10 Claims without artifacts, own statements: "our success rate is 100%", creators "making over $10k to $15k a mon… |
| 19 | VSM (Vanguard Star Management) #14 overall | 2.9 | 0/10 Team size and platforms not published. "120+ Creators managed" and "12 Markets worldwide" are client and marke… | 3/10 Homepage figures: "120+ Creators managed", "$30M+ Generated for our talent", "4.7× Avg. growth in 90 days", an… |
| 20 | Seluna #16 overall | 2.7 | 0/10 No team number, no roster number and no location. The site's only size signal is the word "Boutique". Not disc… | 3/10 Two image tiles captioned "$346,765 With Us" and "$1,073,919 With Us" without name, period or starting point; … |
| 21 | Creators Inc. #18 overall | 2.4 | 0/10 No team or roster number. The homepage publishes activity rather than size: "100M+ Monthly views", "$2B+ in cr… | 10/10 Named, public references with linked press. Homepage: "Shannon Elizabeth", "Hollywood actress", "As seen in Ya… |
Ordered by published scale, then by score. Evidence and dates on each profile. Main ranking · Methodology
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Biggest OnlyFans Agencies by Published Team, Roster and Platforms (2026)”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/best/biggest. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.