Comparison · #8 vs #10 · September 2026
TDM Agency vs FansHub: published terms compared
TDM Agency (#8, 4.1/10, United Kingdom): Publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account. FansHub (#10, 3.4/10, United Kingdom): Publishes a 14-day rolling agreement ("free to leave at any time") and a verifiable UK company whose directors match the two founders named on the site. Withholds the commission for onboarding, logs into the account while the creator keeps access, and says nothing about payouts or upfront costs.
TDM Agency ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
TDM Agency: A creator who wants a large, named, register-verified UK operation with its own chat team and is prepared to get every commercial term in writing before signing, because none of them is on the site. Not for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login or to read the terms before the call.
FansHub: A creator, including a male or trans creator, who wants a UK and US chat team with a short rolling commitment and is willing to hear the split during onboarding. Not for a creator who wants the rate, the payout route or content ownership in writing first. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.
Why TDM Agency ranks above FansHub
Ranked on published terms. The gap between TDM Agency (4.1/10, #8) and FansHub (3.4/10, #10) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
TDM Agency scores higher on 3 criteria: Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (5 vs 0); Commission published (5 vs 0).
FansHub scores higher on 1 criterion: No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6).
Both score the same on 10 criteria. Net difference: 0.7 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | TDM Agency | FansHub |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published. Homepage: "We typically work on a revenue-share basis". The only figure, "we take our 50%", appears in a referral-program example on a separate page | Withheld: "The exact split depends on your account and is discussed during onboarding" |
| Basis | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum term | No minimum term stated. "Lifetime Trial", "ZERO commitments" and "Cancel Anytime" appear on the trans-creator landing page only; the homepage journey runs through "the contract is signed" and the FAQ speaks of "full legally binding contracts" | None: "14-day rolling agreement, meaning you're free to leave at any time" |
| Notice period | Not published | Not stated as a clause; the rolling period is 14 days |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | Not published | Not published |
| Who holds the login | Agency logs in: "We log in, organise content, learn your voice"; creator keeps "full access" | Shared: "when we log into your account"; "You retain full ownership and access to your accounts at all times" |
| Where payouts go | Not published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Not published for creator content; the site terms license only material uploaded to the website | Not published for content; "full ownership and access to your accounts" |
| Binding agreement public | No. Site terms refer to separate service agreements; the FAQ confirms a signed contract. | No. "The terms are clearly explained before you sign anything"; the "Terms Of Policy" page is a copy of the privacy policy. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | TDM Agency | FansHub |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 6 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator owns the content | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 3 Partly published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
TDM Agency profile · FansHub profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “TDM Agency vs FansHub: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/tdm-agency-vs-fanshub. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.