Comparison · #7 vs #8 · September 2026
SirenCY vs TDM Agency: published terms compared
SirenCY (#7, 5.4/10, Australia): Publishes a 35% fee with the basis left to the agreement, a register-verified Australian entity, and creator-owned content with a licence that ends at termination. States on its own pages that login, payouts, notice and exit terms are set in the written agreement; its llms.txt claims otherwise. TDM Agency (#8, 4.1/10, United Kingdom): Publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account.
SirenCY ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
SirenCY: A creator who values a clean content clause and a verifiable entity, and who will negotiate every other term on the call. Not for a creator who wants to know the basis of the fee, who holds the login or how she leaves before applying.
TDM Agency: A creator who wants a large, named, register-verified UK operation with its own chat team and is prepared to get every commercial term in writing before signing, because none of them is on the site. Not for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login or to read the terms before the call. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.
Why SirenCY ranks above TDM Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between SirenCY (5.4/10, #7) and TDM Agency (4.1/10, #8) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
SirenCY scores higher on 3 criteria: Creator owns the content (10 vs 0); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); No upfront cost (5 vs 0).
TDM Agency scores higher on 1 criterion: Scale and infrastructure, published (7 vs 4).
Both score the same on 10 criteria. Net difference: 1.3 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | SirenCY | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 35%, published ("SirenCY's verified agency fee is 35%"); llms.txt says 30–50% | Not published. Homepage: "We typically work on a revenue-share basis". The only figure, "we take our 50%", appears in a referral-program example on a separate page |
| Basis | "Basis defined in agreement" on the pricing page; llms.txt says net after the platform's 20% | Not published |
| Minimum term | Set in the agreement ("Your agreement documents the notice period, exit terms, and service scope"); llms.txt says month-to-month | No minimum term stated. "Lifetime Trial", "ZERO commitments" and "Cancel Anytime" appear on the trans-creator landing page only; the homepage journey runs through "the contract is signed" and the FAQ speaks of "full legally binding contracts" |
| Notice period | Set in the agreement; llms.txt: "standard notice", no length | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | Not on any page for people; llms.txt: "no upfront fees" | Not published |
| Who holds the login | Set in the agreement ("credential handling must be confirmed in the written agreement"); terms provide for return of account access within 7 days | Agency logs in: "We log in, organise content, learn your voice"; creator keeps "full access" |
| Where payouts go | Set in the agreement; llms.txt describes payouts from the agency "via PayPal or bank transfer" | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator owns content; licence ends at termination (site terms, section 3) | Not published for creator content; the site terms license only material uploaded to the website |
| Binding agreement public | No. Site terms state that the signed agreement prevails over them. | No. Site terms refer to separate service agreements; the FAQ confirms a signed contract. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | SirenCY | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 6 Partly published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator owns the content | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 3 Partly published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 4 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
SirenCY profile · TDM Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “SirenCY vs TDM Agency: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/sirency-vs-tdm-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.