Comparison · #2 vs #9 · November 2026
OnModelStudios vs TDM Agency: published terms compared
OnModelStudios (#2, 8.1/10, United States): OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1. TDM Agency (#9, 4.1/10, United Kingdom): TDM Agency publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account.
OnModelStudios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
OnModelStudios: A creator whose revenue is mostly messages and who wants to see dashboard screenshots before signing, with a mid-sized remote team. Not for a creator under roughly $3,000 a month, whom the agency itself says usually should not sign.
TDM Agency: A UK creator who wants a Companies House-registered agency and is prepared to get every commercial term in writing before signing, because none of them is on the site. Not for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login or to read the terms before the call. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why OnModelStudios ranks above TDM Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between OnModelStudios (8.1/10, #2) and TDM Agency (4.1/10, #9) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
OnModelStudios scores higher on 10 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No upfront cost (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (5 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5); Commission published (10 vs 5); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7); Content protection included and described (7 vs 5).
TDM Agency scores higher on no criterion.
Both score the same on 4 criteria. Net difference: 4.0 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | OnModelStudios | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Full management 50% in its own calculator example; the published range is 25–55% of earnings after platform fees, with 25% the chat-only tier | Not published. Homepage: "We typically work on a revenue-share basis". The only figure, "we take our 50%", appears in a referral-program example on a separate page |
| Basis | Net, after the platform fees, published for the whole range in the FAQ | Not published |
| Minimum term | None, published | No minimum term stated. "Lifetime Trial", "ZERO commitments" and "Cancel Anytime" appear on the trans-creator landing page only; the homepage journey runs through "the contract is signed" and the FAQ speaks of "full legally binding contracts" |
| Notice period | The arrangement ends within 48 hours of the creator's notice, published | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published on any page for people; one sentence in llms.txt | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | Not published |
| Who holds the login | Creator keeps login; agency works through granted access, published | Agency logs in: "We log in, organise content, learn your voice"; creator keeps "full access" |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator; commission invoiced afterwards, published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the footer; license for content made during the engagement in a private agreement | Not published for creator content; the site terms license only material uploaded to the website |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms state they are not a management agreement; that is a separate signed document. | No. Site terms refer to separate service agreements; the FAQ confirms a signed contract. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | OnModelStudios | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
OnModelStudios profile · TDM Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “OnModelStudios vs TDM Agency: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/onmodelstudios-vs-tdm-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.