Comparison · #2 vs #8 · September 2026
OnModelStudios vs Hush Talent: published terms compared
OnModelStudios (#2, 8.1/10, United States): Publishes a 25–55% commission range (basis stated only for the 25% chat-only tier), creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1. Hush Talent (#8, 4.9/10, United States): A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
OnModelStudios ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
OnModelStudios: A creator already earning a few thousand a month with DM-heavy revenue who wants numbers over promises and is comfortable with a mid-sized remote team. Not for a creator under roughly $3,000 a month, whom the agency itself says usually should not sign.
Hush Talent: A creator who wants a published flat rate on gross revenue and accepts a 90-day first term, including creators below $5,000 a month, since no minimum income applies. Not for a creator who wants to leave at any time from day one, or who needs the payout route and any post-exit commission in writing before a call. Of the twenty agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.4/10. Last checked 23 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 23 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 20 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.4/10.
Why OnModelStudios ranks above Hush Talent
Ranked on published terms. The gap between OnModelStudios (8.1/10, #2) and Hush Talent (4.9/10, #8) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
OnModelStudios scores higher on 8 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 3); Content protection included and described (7 vs 0); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7).
Hush Talent scores higher on 1 criterion: Longevity, documented (10 vs 7).
Both score the same on 5 criteria. Net difference: 3.2 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | OnModelStudios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 25–55% of earnings after platform fees, published | 20% for full management; 15% of deal value on brand deals: "Those are the only two rates." The homepage also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call" |
| Basis | Net, after the platform fees, published for the whole range in the FAQ | Gross: "20% of gross managed revenue" |
| Minimum term | None, published | 90-day initial term: "The initial term is 90 days" |
| Notice period | The arrangement ends within 48 hours of the creator's notice, published | 30 days after the initial term: "After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice" |
| Commission after exit | Not published on any page for people; one sentence in llms.txt | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None: "no application fee, no onboarding fee, and no monthly minimum" |
| Who holds the login | Creator keeps login; agency works through granted access, published | Delegated access, as advice in a guide: "A legitimate agency does not need your OnlyFans, Fansly, or social media passwords" |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator; commission invoiced afterwards, published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the footer; license for content made during the engagement in a private agreement | Creator: "The content itself remains yours, during the agreement and after it ends"; paid casting shoots excepted |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms state they are not a management agreement; that is a separate signed document. | No. A sample agreement is offered after the strategy call. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | OnModelStudios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 3 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
OnModelStudios profile · Hush Talent profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “OnModelStudios vs Hush Talent: published terms compared”, 23 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/onmodelstudios-vs-hush-talent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.