Comparison · #2 vs #8 · November 2026
OnModelStudios vs Hush Talent: published terms compared
OnModelStudios (#2, 8.1/10, United States): OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1. Hush Talent (#8, 4.9/10, United States): A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
OnModelStudios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
OnModelStudios: A creator whose revenue is mostly messages and who wants to see dashboard screenshots before signing, with a mid-sized remote team. Not for a creator under roughly $3,000 a month, whom the agency itself says usually should not sign.
Hush Talent: A creator who wants a published flat rate, 20% charged on gross revenue, and accepts a 90-day first term. Not for a creator who wants to leave at any time from day one, or who needs the payout route and any post-exit commission in writing before a call. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why OnModelStudios ranks above Hush Talent
Ranked on published terms. The gap between OnModelStudios (8.1/10, #2) and Hush Talent (4.9/10, #8) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
OnModelStudios scores higher on 8 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 3); Content protection included and described (7 vs 0); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7).
Hush Talent scores higher on 1 criterion: Longevity, documented (10 vs 7).
Both score the same on 5 criteria. Net difference: 3.2 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | OnModelStudios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Full management 50% in its own calculator example; the published range is 25–55% of earnings after platform fees, with 25% the chat-only tier | 20% for full management; 15% of deal value on brand deals: "Those are the only two rates." The homepage also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call" |
| Basis | Net, after the platform fees, published for the whole range in the FAQ | Gross: "20% of gross managed revenue" |
| Minimum term | None, published | 90-day initial term: "The initial term is 90 days" |
| Notice period | The arrangement ends within 48 hours of the creator's notice, published | 30 days after the initial term: "After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice" |
| Commission after exit | Not published on any page for people; one sentence in llms.txt | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None: "no application fee, no onboarding fee, and no monthly minimum" |
| Who holds the login | Creator keeps login; agency works through granted access, published | Delegated access, as advice in a guide: "A legitimate agency does not need your OnlyFans, Fansly, or social media passwords" |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator; commission invoiced afterwards, published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the footer; license for content made during the engagement in a private agreement | Creator: "The content itself remains yours, during the agreement and after it ends"; paid casting shoots excepted |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms state they are not a management agreement; that is a separate signed document. | No. A sample agreement is offered after the strategy call. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | OnModelStudios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 3 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
OnModelStudios profile · Hush Talent profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “OnModelStudios vs Hush Talent: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/onmodelstudios-vs-hush-talent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.