Comparison · #4 vs #8 · September 2026
Aruna Talent vs Hush Talent: published terms compared
Aruna Talent (#4, 6.1/10, United States): Publishes a 60/40 split of net on OnlyFans, but only in its llms.txt, not on any page a creator reads; publishes no login policy, no payout route and no post-exit clause; publishes a no-minimum-term agreement with 30 days' notice either side, no upfront cost, results with a live-dashboard route, and names three competitors as better fits for situations it does not serve. Hush Talent (#8, 4.9/10, United States): A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
Aruna Talent ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
Aruna Talent: A creator starting from zero who values not being recognized above every other consideration, and who is comfortable learning the commission on a call. Not for a creator with an existing following, whom the agency says it does not accept, or for one who wants the terms in writing before talking.
Hush Talent: A creator who wants a published flat rate on gross revenue and accepts a 90-day first term, including creators below $5,000 a month, since no minimum income applies. Not for a creator who wants to leave at any time from day one, or who needs the payout route and any post-exit commission in writing before a call. Of the twenty agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.4/10. Last checked 23 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 23 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 20 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.4/10.
Why Aruna Talent ranks above Hush Talent
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Aruna Talent (6.1/10, #4) and Hush Talent (4.9/10, #8) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
Aruna Talent scores higher on 6 criteria: Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 3); Content protection included and described (7 vs 0); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7).
Hush Talent scores higher on 3 criteria: Longevity, documented (10 vs 4); Creator keeps sole login (5 vs 0); Commission published (10 vs 5).
Both score the same on 5 criteria. Net difference: 1.2 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Aruna Talent | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 60/40 of net on OnlyFans (Aruna 60%), published in llms.txt only. 50/50 on cam platforms. No rate on any page a creator reads. | 20% for full management; 15% of deal value on brand deals: "Those are the only two rates." The homepage also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call" |
| Basis | Net, after the platform's 20%, published | Gross: "20% of gross managed revenue" |
| Minimum term | None, published ("The Talent Management Agreement has no minimum term") | 90-day initial term: "The initial term is 90 days" |
| Notice period | 30 days' written notice either side, published in llms.txt | 30 days after the initial term: "After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice" |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None: "no application fee, no onboarding fee, and no monthly minimum" |
| Who holds the login | Not published | Delegated access, as advice in a guide: "A legitimate agency does not need your OnlyFans, Fansly, or social media passwords" |
| Where payouts go | Not published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the terms; license terms in a private creator agreement | Creator: "The content itself remains yours, during the agreement and after it ends"; paid casting shoots excepted |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms say the creator relationship is governed by individual creator agreements that are not published. | No. A sample agreement is offered after the strategy call. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Aruna Talent | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 5 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 0 Not found on the site Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 3 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 4 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Aruna Talent profile · Hush Talent profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Aruna Talent vs Hush Talent: published terms compared”, 23 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-hush-talent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.