Comparison · #3 vs #8 · November 2026
Aruna Talent vs Hush Talent: published terms compared
Aruna Talent (#3, 6.4/10, United States): Aruna Talent publishes no commission rate, only that its share is charged on net and set on the discovery call; publishes no payout route and no post-exit clause; states the creator's own logins in its llms.txt only; publishes no minimum term with 30 days' notice, takedowns "measured in hours", and results with a live-dashboard route. Hush Talent (#8, 4.9/10, United States): A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
Aruna Talent ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Aruna Talent: A creator who is comfortable learning the commission on a call. Not for a creator with an existing following, whom the agency says it does not accept, or for one who wants the terms in writing before talking.
Hush Talent: A creator who wants a published flat rate, 20% charged on gross revenue, and accepts a 90-day first term. Not for a creator who wants to leave at any time from day one, or who needs the payout route and any post-exit commission in writing before a call. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Aruna Talent ranks above Hush Talent
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Aruna Talent (6.4/10, #3) and Hush Talent (4.9/10, #8) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Aruna Talent scores higher on 6 criteria: Content protection included and described (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 3); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7).
Hush Talent scores higher on 2 criteria: Commission published (10 vs 0); Longevity, documented (10 vs 4).
Both score the same on 6 criteria. Net difference: 1.5 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Aruna Talent | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published. llms.txt gives the basis only: "Aruna's share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee; the exact split is laid out on the discovery call." | 20% for full management; 15% of deal value on brand deals: "Those are the only two rates." The homepage also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call" |
| Basis | Net, after the platform's 20%, published | Gross: "20% of gross managed revenue" |
| Minimum term | None, published ("The Talent Management Agreement has no minimum term") | 90-day initial term: "The initial term is 90 days" |
| Notice period | 30 days' written notice, on the homepage and the management page | 30 days after the initial term: "After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice" |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None: "no application fee, no onboarding fee, and no monthly minimum" |
| Who holds the login | Creator's own logins, stated in llms.txt only | Delegated access, as advice in a guide: "A legitimate agency does not need your OnlyFans, Fansly, or social media passwords" |
| Where payouts go | Not published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the terms; license terms in a private creator agreement | Creator: "The content itself remains yours, during the agreement and after it ends"; paid casting shoots excepted |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms say the creator relationship is governed by individual creator agreements that are not published. | No. A sample agreement is offered after the strategy call. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Aruna Talent | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 3 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 4 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Aruna Talent profile · Hush Talent profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Aruna Talent vs Hush Talent: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-hush-talent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.