Sub-ranking · from the same data as the main index

OnlyFans agencies that publish five or more platforms

As of 3 November 2026, OnModelStudios leads the four of the 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies scored in this index that publish management on five or more platforms, at 8.1/10, ahead of Bunny Agency at 6.0/10. This list is one view of the index, which is led overall by FantasyRise at 9.6/10. The list is ordered by the full published-terms score, under methodology v1.1, which scores only what each agency publishes on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.

For a creator who wants one agency running her presence on several platforms at once, coverage matters more than this index's headline order allows for. Agencies here publish five or more platforms. Scale is shown as its own criterion; it is where the largest operations lead and the small ones do not pretend to.

Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.

This list is a filter of the main index, not the index itself. The overall #1 on published terms is FantasyRise (9.6/10); the full order of all 21 scored agencies is on the main ranking, scored under the same methodology.

The list

  1. 1

    OnModelStudios

    Oakland Park, Florida (registered); team in Europe and the Philippines · #2 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

    OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1.

    • Commission public
    • Creator keeps login
    • Direct payouts
    • No minimum term
    • Post-exit not stated
    • No upfront cost
    8.1
  2. 2

    Bunny Agency

    Sheridan, Wyoming (registered); operations stated as Florida, studios in six cities · #6 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

    Publishes 112+ team members and 400+ creators (own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.

    • Commission partly
    • Login not stated
    • Payout route not stated
    • No minimum term stated
    • Post-exit not stated
    • No upfront cost
    6.0
  3. 3

    Hush Talent

    Los Angeles, California (registered service address); offices in Greenwich, Connecticut and New York · #8 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

    A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.

    • Commission public
    • Shared access
    • Payout route not stated
    • Term partly stated
    • Post-exit not stated
    • No upfront cost
    4.9
  4. 4

    Vantage Agency

    Not published: no address, no country, no jurisdiction anywhere on the site · #17 overall · published-terms score · checked 1 October 2026

    A one-page site for a deliberately private agency: it publishes a 30–50% revenue share and "nothing upfront", and then stops. No login rule, no payout route, no minimum term, no notice, no post-exit commission, no content ownership, no terms, no privacy policy, no legal entity, no country. Results are three anonymous testimonials and three aggregate figures with no artifact behind them.

    • Commission partly
    • Login not stated
    • Payout route not stated
    • Term not stated
    • Post-exit not stated
    • No upfront cost
    2.6

The same list as a table, with the two criteria that define it

#AgencyScoreScaleCommission public
1OnModelStudios
#2 overall
8.110/10
"35+ people, across Europe and the Philippines"; ten platforms named. Roster size not published. Own statement…
10/10
FAQ, "How much of my revenue do you take?": "Our commission ranges from 25% to 55% of your earnings after plat…
2Bunny Agency
#6 overall
6.010/10
"112+ team members", "400+ creators managed", "$35M+ revenue generated", studios in Miami, New York, Los Angel…
5/10
Published without a basis. Contract page: "Our commission is published: 25%–50%, scaling with how much of the …
3Hush Talent
#8 overall
4.97/10
"50+ CREATORS MANAGED" (homepage); platforms named in the FAQ: "OnlyFans, Fansly, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter/X…
10/10
Pricing page: "20% of gross managed revenue for full management, and 15% of deal value on brand deals we sourc…
4Vantage Agency
#17 overall
2.67/10
Nine platforms are named as managed together: "OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, Twitter/X,…
5/10
Published as a range, twice, in both language versions. Offer card 01: "Revenue share, not salary. Transparent…

Ordered by the full published-terms score. Evidence and dates on each profile. Main ranking · Methodology

Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.

Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Best Multi-Platform OnlyFans Agencies (2026)”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/best/multi-platform. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.