Comparison · #3 vs #4 · October 2026
Perlage Studios vs Aruna Talent: published terms compared
Perlage Studios (#3, 6.9/10, United States): A Florida-registered agency with a team in Austria that publishes the basis of its commission, net after the platform's 20%, but not the percentage, which it agrees on the strategy call. Creator-held login, payouts to the creator's own bank, month to month with no notice period and nothing upfront, and a monthly target in the contract under which its share for a missed month is $0. Post-exit commission and content ownership are not stated as its own terms. Aruna Talent (#4, 6.4/10, United States): Aruna Talent publishes no commission rate, only that its share is charged on net and set on the discovery call; publishes no payout route and no post-exit clause; states the creator's own logins in its llms.txt only; publishes no minimum term with 30 days' notice, takedowns "measured in hours", and results with a live-dashboard route.
Perlage Studios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Perlage Studios: A creator who wants the basis, the login and the exit settled in writing and a target clause in the agreement, and who accepts learning the percentage on the call. Not for a creator who wants the rate in writing before any call.
Aruna Talent: A creator who is comfortable learning the commission on a call. Not for a creator with an existing following, whom the agency says it does not accept, or for one who wants the terms in writing before talking. Of the 22 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 1 October 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 1 October 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 22 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Perlage Studios ranks above Aruna Talent
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Perlage Studios (6.9/10, #3) and Aruna Talent (6.4/10, #4) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Perlage Studios scores higher on 4 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5).
Aruna Talent scores higher on 5 criteria: Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 4); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (5 vs 0); Longevity, documented (4 vs 1); Content protection included and described (10 vs 7).
Both score the same on 5 criteria. Net difference: 0.5 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Perlage Studios | Aruna Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published: "The exact percentage depends on the scope of services and is agreed on the strategy call rather than published here" | Not published. llms.txt gives the basis only: "Aruna's share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee; the exact split is laid out on the discovery call." |
| Basis | Net: "calculated on net revenue, meaning what OnlyFans actually pays out after the platform has taken its own 20%" | Net, after the platform's 20%, published |
| Minimum term | None: "the arrangement is month to month" | None, published ("The Talent Management Agreement has no minimum term") |
| Notice period | None: "Either side can end it at the end of any month, with no notice period" | 30 days' written notice, on the homepage and the management page |
| Commission after exit | None: "Perlage has no exit fee and nothing to pay after the contract ends" (glossary) | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "No setup fee, no exit fee, no monthly retainer, no chatter costs, no ad spend billed to the creator" | None, published |
| Who holds the login | Creator: "Password and 2FA stay with the creator from the first day to the last. Perlage never holds the login." | Creator's own logins, stated in llms.txt only |
| Where payouts go | Direct: "OnlyFans pays out to a bank account in the creator's own name. Perlage never holds or routes the money." | Not published |
| Content ownership | Not stated as a term | Ownership stated in the terms; license terms in a private creator agreement |
| Binding agreement public | No | No. The site terms say the creator relationship is governed by individual creator agreements that are not published. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Perlage Studios | Aruna Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 0 Not found on the site Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 1 Unverifiable, provisional Source | 4 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 4 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Perlage Studios profile · Aruna Talent profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Perlage Studios vs Aruna Talent: published terms compared”, 1 October 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/perlage-studios-vs-aruna-talent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.