Comparison · #2 vs #5 · November 2026
OnModelStudios vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared
OnModelStudios (#2, 8.1/10, United States): OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1. Foxy Studios (#5, 6.2/10, Switzerland): Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
OnModelStudios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
OnModelStudios: A creator whose revenue is mostly messages and who wants to see dashboard screenshots before signing, with a mid-sized remote team. Not for a creator under roughly $3,000 a month, whom the agency itself says usually should not sign.
Foxy Studios: A creator who wants a female-led Swiss agency that takes six creators a quarter, and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants sole control of her login written into the terms. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why OnModelStudios ranks above Foxy Studios
Ranked on published terms. The gap between OnModelStudios (8.1/10, #2) and Foxy Studios (6.2/10, #5) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
OnModelStudios scores higher on 6 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7); Content protection included and described (7 vs 5).
Foxy Studios scores higher on 1 criterion: Creator owns the content (10 vs 5).
Both score the same on 7 criteria. Net difference: 1.9 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | OnModelStudios | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Full management 50% in its own calculator example; the published range is 25–55% of earnings after platform fees, with 25% the chat-only tier | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; a higher tier is set on a call |
| Basis | Net, after the platform fees, published for the whole range in the FAQ | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis |
| Minimum term | None, published | None; month-to-month, in the terms |
| Notice period | The arrangement ends within 48 hours of the creator's notice, published | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms |
| Commission after exit | Not published on any page for people; one sentence in llms.txt | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval |
| Who holds the login | Creator keeps login; agency works through granted access, published | Two statements: "Creators keep their accounts, content, and logins. Always." (own ranking article) and, in the terms, the agency hands back "account credentials ... in our possession within 14 days" |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator; commission invoiced afterwards, published | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the footer; license for content made during the engagement in a private agreement | Creator, in the terms |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms state they are not a management agreement; that is a separate signed document. | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | OnModelStudios | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
OnModelStudios profile · Foxy Studios profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “OnModelStudios vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/onmodelstudios-vs-foxy-studios. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.