Comparison · #2 vs #5 · September 2026
OnModelStudios vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared
OnModelStudios (#2, 7.5/10, United States): Publishes a 25–55% commission range (basis stated only for the 25% chat-only tier), creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1. Foxy Studios (#5, 5.7/10, Switzerland): Publishes the most terms of any agency in the index: a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. Does not publish who holds the login, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
OnModelStudios ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
OnModelStudios: A creator already earning a few thousand a month with DM-heavy revenue who wants numbers over promises and is comfortable with a mid-sized remote team. Not for a creator under roughly $3,000 a month, whom the agency itself says usually should not sign.
Foxy Studios: An established creator with an audience who wants the rate and the exit in writing before the first call and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.
Why OnModelStudios ranks above Foxy Studios
Ranked on published terms. The gap between OnModelStudios (7.5/10, #2) and Foxy Studios (5.7/10, #5) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
OnModelStudios scores higher on 5 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Content protection included and described (7 vs 0); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5).
Foxy Studios scores higher on 3 criteria: Creator owns the content (10 vs 5); Commission published (10 vs 5); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6).
Both score the same on 6 criteria. Net difference: 1.8 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | OnModelStudios | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 25–55% of account revenue, published | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; elite tier above $50,000 a month set on a call |
| Basis | Net stated for the 25% chat-only tier and in the calculator model; not stated for the range | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis |
| Minimum term | None, published | None; month-to-month, in the terms |
| Notice period | Exists, length not published | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval |
| Who holds the login | Creator keeps login; agency works through granted access, published | Not published; the terms provide that on termination Foxy Studios hands back "account credentials, content libraries, and any other materials in our possession within 14 days", which says the agency holds credentials without saying whose they are |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator; commission invoiced afterwards, published | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the footer; license for content made during the engagement in a private agreement | Creator, in the terms |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms state they are not a management agreement; that is a separate signed document. | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | OnModelStudios | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 5 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 6 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
OnModelStudios profile · Foxy Studios profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “OnModelStudios vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/onmodelstudios-vs-foxy-studios. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.