Comparison · #2 vs #6 · September 2026

OnModelStudios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared

OnModelStudios (#2, 7.5/10, United States): Publishes a 25–55% commission range (basis stated only for the 25% chat-only tier), creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1. Bunny Agency (#6, 5.6/10, United States): The largest operation in the index (112+ team, 400+ creators, own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.

OnModelStudios ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.

OnModelStudios: A creator already earning a few thousand a month with DM-heavy revenue who wants numbers over promises and is comfortable with a mid-sized remote team. Not for a creator under roughly $3,000 a month, whom the agency itself says usually should not sign.

Bunny Agency: A creator who wants one agency running her presence across many platforms at once and values the security of the largest, longest-running operation, and who will get the commission, the login policy and the exit terms in writing before signing. Not for a creator who wants those terms published before the call. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.

Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.

Why OnModelStudios ranks above Bunny Agency

Ranked on published terms. The gap between OnModelStudios (7.5/10, #2) and Bunny Agency (5.6/10, #6) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.

OnModelStudios scores higher on 5 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (5 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 6).

Bunny Agency scores higher on 2 criteria: Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Longevity, documented (10 vs 7).

Both score the same on 7 criteria. Net difference: 1.9 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.

Published terms side by side

TermOnModelStudiosBunny Agency
Commission25–55% of account revenue, published25–50%, published only on the agency's own comparison article; main pages say the rate is disclosed on a free consultation
BasisNet stated for the 25% chat-only tier and in the calculator model; not stated for the rangeExplained in general terms (net, after the platform's 20%, charged on revenue), not stated as the agency's own clause
Minimum termNone, published"No long-term lock-in", "Cancel anytime"; no minimum term figure published
Notice periodExists, length not publishedNot published
Commission after exitNot publishedNot published
Upfront costNone, publishedNone, published
Who holds the loginCreator keeps login; agency works through granted access, publishedNot published
Where payouts goDirect to the creator; commission invoiced afterwards, publishedNot published
Content ownershipOwnership stated in the footer; license for content made during the engagement in a private agreementNot published as the agency's own clause
Binding agreement publicNo. The site terms state they are not a management agreement; that is a separate signed document.No. The site terms state that any management relationship is governed by a separate written agreement.

Scorecard side by side, with status and source

CriterionOnModelStudiosBunny Agency
Commission published5
Partly published
Source
5
Partly published
Source
Creator keeps sole login10
Published
Source
0
Not found on the site
Source
Payouts go direct to the creator10
Published
Source
0
Not found on the site
Source
No minimum term, clear exit6
Partly published
Source
6
Partly published
Source
No commission after exit0
Not found on the site
Source
0
Not found on the site
Source
No upfront cost10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
Creator owns the content5
Partly published
Source
0
Not found on the site
Source
Verifiable legal entity10
Published
Source
5
Partly published · provisional
Source
Longevity, documented7
Partly published
Source
10
Published
Source
Results with a verification route10
Published
Source
6
Partly published
Source
Says who should not sign5
Partly published
Source
10
Published
Source
Scope of the commission itemized10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
Scale and infrastructure, published10
Published
Source
10
Published
Source
Content protection included and described7
Partly published
Source
7
Partly published
Source

Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.

OnModelStudios profile · Bunny Agency profile · Main ranking

Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.

Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “OnModelStudios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/onmodelstudios-vs-bunny-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.