Comparison · #2 vs #6 · November 2026
OnModelStudios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared
OnModelStudios (#2, 8.1/10, United States): OnModelStudios shows 50% for full management in its own calculator and publishes a 25–55% range, the 25% being the chat-only tier, creator-held login, direct payouts, no minimum term and no upfront cost; does not publish the notice period, the post-exit clause or the content license. Runs the OFAgencies directory, where it ranks itself #1. Bunny Agency (#6, 6.0/10, United States): Publishes 112+ team members and 400+ creators (own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.
OnModelStudios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
OnModelStudios: A creator whose revenue is mostly messages and who wants to see dashboard screenshots before signing, with a mid-sized remote team. Not for a creator under roughly $3,000 a month, whom the agency itself says usually should not sign.
Bunny Agency: A creator who wants one agency running her presence across ten platforms at once, and who will get the commission, the login policy and the exit terms in writing before signing. Not for a creator who wants those terms published before the call. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why OnModelStudios ranks above Bunny Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between OnModelStudios (8.1/10, #2) and Bunny Agency (6.0/10, #6) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
OnModelStudios scores higher on 6 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Commission published (10 vs 5); Results with a verification route (10 vs 6); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6).
Bunny Agency scores higher on 2 criteria: Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Longevity, documented (10 vs 7).
Both score the same on 6 criteria. Net difference: 2.1 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | OnModelStudios | Bunny Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Full management 50% in its own calculator example; the published range is 25–55% of earnings after platform fees, with 25% the chat-only tier | 25–50%, published only on the agency's own comparison article; main pages say the rate is disclosed on a free consultation |
| Basis | Net, after the platform fees, published for the whole range in the FAQ | Explained in general terms (net, after the platform's 20%, charged on revenue), not stated as the agency's own clause |
| Minimum term | None, published | "No long-term lock-in", "Cancel anytime"; no minimum term figure published |
| Notice period | The arrangement ends within 48 hours of the creator's notice, published | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published on any page for people; one sentence in llms.txt | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None, published |
| Who holds the login | Creator keeps login; agency works through granted access, published | Not published |
| Where payouts go | Direct to the creator; commission invoiced afterwards, published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the footer; license for content made during the engagement in a private agreement | Ownership stated as the agency's own commitment: "You keep ownership of your OnlyFans account and your content"; license terms not published |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms state they are not a management agreement; that is a separate signed document. | No. The site terms state that any management relationship is governed by a separate written agreement. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | OnModelStudios | Bunny Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published · provisional Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
OnModelStudios profile · Bunny Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “OnModelStudios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/onmodelstudios-vs-bunny-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.