Comparison · #4 vs #20 · November 2026
Lumina Connect vs Teasy Agency: published terms compared
Lumina Connect (#4, 6.2/10, Germany): Lumina Connect publishes the structural terms in plain sentences: the creator keeps the login on her own email and password, platform payouts land in her bank account, no upfront fees, no lock-in, leak removal included. Withholds the commission rate for the call and has no public contract text. Teasy Agency (#20, 2.3/10, United States): Teasy Agency publishes no commission, no contract terms and no legal entity. Its own FAQ asks "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers without a number. The one published creator term is "zero startup fees". Strong trade-show presence and a published 5% referral program.
Lumina Connect ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Lumina Connect: A creator who wants to sign off on every post before it goes out and values that over knowing the rate before the first call. Not for a creator who wants the split in writing before talking, or who needs a large team.
Teasy Agency: A creator who wants a US team with trade-show presence and side brands (Teasy Marketing, WannaCollab), and is prepared to get every commercial term on the call, because none is written down publicly. Not for a creator who wants the rate, the exit or the company behind the contract in writing first. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Lumina Connect ranks above Teasy Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Lumina Connect (6.2/10, #4) and Teasy Agency (2.3/10, #20) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Lumina Connect scores higher on 8 criteria: Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 0); Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Content protection included and described (7 vs 0); No minimum term, clear exit (6 vs 0); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (5 vs 0); Creator owns the content (5 vs 0).
Teasy Agency scores higher on 1 criterion: Scale and infrastructure, published (7 vs 4).
Both score the same on 5 criteria. Net difference: 3.9 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Lumina Connect | Teasy Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Withheld: "anyone who quotes you a percentage before seeing your account is guessing. On the call we break the split down transparently" | Not published. FAQ: "Teasy Agency normally works on a commission-based model, so we take a percentage of the revenue", no figure |
| Basis | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum term | None: "No lock-in, no exit penalties ... you can leave any day" | Not published; "contracts are tailored to the creator's specific needs and feature shorter terms" |
| Notice period | Not published; "Terms and notice are agreed in writing before you start" | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published; "No exit clauses, no leftovers" | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "No upfront fees. Commission only. If you do not earn, we do not earn." | None for setup: "Zero startup fees" (homepage comparison table); other extras neither priced nor excluded |
| Who holds the login | Creator: "Your accounts stay in your name, on your email, with your password. We work through access you grant and can revoke." | Not published |
| Where payouts go | Direct: "Platform payouts land in your bank account, not ours - our commission is settled afterwards" | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator, as a homepage statement: "Login, content and fans stay in your name"; no contract text | Not published for creator content; the terms keep the agency's own marketing materials with the agency |
| Binding agreement public | No. There is no terms page and no contract text; "Terms and notice are agreed in writing before you start." | No. Terms: "Specific details regarding service fees, payment schedules, and related financial terms will be outlined in individual service agreements or contracts." |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Lumina Connect | Teasy Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 6 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Longevity, documented | 4 Partly published Source | 4 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 6 Partly published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 4 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Lumina Connect profile · Teasy Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Lumina Connect vs Teasy Agency: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/lumina-connect-vs-teasy-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.