Comparison · #3 vs #17 · September 2026
Lumina Connect vs Teasy Agency: published terms compared
Lumina Connect (#3, 6.2/10, Germany): Publishes the structural terms unusually clearly: the creator keeps the login on her own email and password, platform payouts land in her bank account, no upfront fees, no lock-in, leak removal included. Withholds the commission rate for the call and has no public contract text. Teasy Agency (#17, 2.3/10, United States): Publishes no commission, no contract terms and no legal entity. Its own FAQ asks "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers without a number. The one published creator term is "zero startup fees". Strong trade-show presence and a published 5% referral program.
Lumina Connect ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
Lumina Connect: A creator with an existing account and English-speaking audience who values control (own login, own payouts, sign-off on every post) over knowing the rate before the first call. Not for a creator who wants the split in writing before talking, or who needs a large team.
Teasy Agency: A creator who wants a large US team with a marketing arm and side brands, and is prepared to get every commercial term on the call, because none is written down publicly. Not for a creator who wants the rate, the exit or the company behind the contract in writing first. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.
Why Lumina Connect ranks above Teasy Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Lumina Connect (6.2/10, #3) and Teasy Agency (2.3/10, #17) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
Lumina Connect scores higher on 8 criteria: Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 0); Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Content protection included and described (7 vs 0); No minimum term, clear exit (6 vs 0); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (5 vs 0); Creator owns the content (5 vs 0).
Teasy Agency scores higher on 1 criterion: Scale and infrastructure, published (7 vs 4).
Both score the same on 5 criteria. Net difference: 3.9 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Lumina Connect | Teasy Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Withheld: "anyone who quotes you a percentage before seeing your account is guessing. On the call we break the split down transparently" | Not published. FAQ: "Teasy Agency normally works on a commission-based model, so we take a percentage of the revenue", no figure |
| Basis | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum term | None: "No lock-in, no exit penalties ... you can leave any day" | Not published; "contracts are tailored to the creator's specific needs and feature shorter terms" |
| Notice period | Not published; "Terms and notice are agreed in writing before you start" | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published; "No exit clauses, no leftovers" | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "No upfront fees. Commission only. If you do not earn, we do not earn." | None for setup: "Zero startup fees" (homepage comparison table); other extras neither priced nor excluded |
| Who holds the login | Creator: "Your accounts stay in your name, on your email, with your password. We work through access you grant and can revoke." | Not published |
| Where payouts go | Direct: "Platform payouts land in your bank account, not ours - our commission is settled afterwards" | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator, as a homepage statement: "Login, content and fans stay in your name"; no contract text | Not published for creator content; the terms keep the agency's own marketing materials with the agency |
| Binding agreement public | No. There is no terms page and no contract text; "Terms and notice are agreed in writing before you start." | No. Terms: "Specific details regarding service fees, payment schedules, and related financial terms will be outlined in individual service agreements or contracts." |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Lumina Connect | Teasy Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 6 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Longevity, documented | 4 Partly published Source | 4 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 6 Partly published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 4 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Lumina Connect profile · Teasy Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Lumina Connect vs Teasy Agency: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/lumina-connect-vs-teasy-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.