Comparison · #5 vs #9 · November 2026
Foxy Studios vs TDM Agency: published terms compared
Foxy Studios (#5, 6.2/10, Switzerland): Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing. TDM Agency (#9, 4.1/10, United Kingdom): TDM Agency publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account.
Foxy Studios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Foxy Studios: A creator who wants a female-led Swiss agency that takes six creators a quarter, and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants sole control of her login written into the terms.
TDM Agency: A UK creator who wants a Companies House-registered agency and is prepared to get every commercial term in writing before signing, because none of them is on the site. Not for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login or to read the terms before the call. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Foxy Studios ranks above TDM Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Foxy Studios (6.2/10, #5) and TDM Agency (4.1/10, #9) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Foxy Studios scores higher on 5 criteria: No upfront cost (10 vs 0); Creator owns the content (10 vs 0); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Commission published (10 vs 5); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6).
TDM Agency scores higher on 1 criterion: Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5).
Both score the same on 8 criteria. Net difference: 2.1 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Foxy Studios | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; a higher tier is set on a call | Not published. Homepage: "We typically work on a revenue-share basis". The only figure, "we take our 50%", appears in a referral-program example on a separate page |
| Basis | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis | Not published |
| Minimum term | None; month-to-month, in the terms | No minimum term stated. "Lifetime Trial", "ZERO commitments" and "Cancel Anytime" appear on the trans-creator landing page only; the homepage journey runs through "the contract is signed" and the FAQ speaks of "full legally binding contracts" |
| Notice period | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval | Not published |
| Who holds the login | Two statements: "Creators keep their accounts, content, and logins. Always." (own ranking article) and, in the terms, the agency hands back "account credentials ... in our possession within 14 days" | Agency logs in: "We log in, organise content, learn your voice"; creator keeps "full access" |
| Where payouts go | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator, in the terms | Not published for creator content; the site terms license only material uploaded to the website |
| Binding agreement public | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." | No. Site terms refer to separate service agreements; the FAQ confirms a signed contract. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Foxy Studios | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator owns the content | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 5 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 3 Partly published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 7 Published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Foxy Studios profile · TDM Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Foxy Studios vs TDM Agency: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/foxy-studios-vs-tdm-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.