Comparison · #5 vs #8 · November 2026
Foxy Studios vs Hush Talent: published terms compared
Foxy Studios (#5, 6.2/10, Switzerland): Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing. Hush Talent (#8, 4.9/10, United States): A California-incorporated agency that publishes its rate on a pricing page, 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of brand-deal value, with nothing upfront and a 90-day initial term that then runs month to month on 30 days' notice. Payouts, post-exit commission and content protection are not published, and the homepage also says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call.
Foxy Studios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Foxy Studios: A creator who wants a female-led Swiss agency that takes six creators a quarter, and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants sole control of her login written into the terms.
Hush Talent: A creator who wants a published flat rate, 20% charged on gross revenue, and accepts a 90-day first term. Not for a creator who wants to leave at any time from day one, or who needs the payout route and any post-exit commission in writing before a call. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Foxy Studios ranks above Hush Talent
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Foxy Studios (6.2/10, #5) and Hush Talent (4.9/10, #8) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Foxy Studios scores higher on 4 criteria: No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 3); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (10 vs 5); Content protection included and described (5 vs 0).
Hush Talent scores higher on 1 criterion: Longevity, documented (10 vs 7).
Both score the same on 9 criteria. Net difference: 1.3 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Foxy Studios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; a higher tier is set on a call | 20% for full management; 15% of deal value on brand deals: "Those are the only two rates." The homepage also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call" |
| Basis | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis | Gross: "20% of gross managed revenue" |
| Minimum term | None; month-to-month, in the terms | 90-day initial term: "The initial term is 90 days" |
| Notice period | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms | 30 days after the initial term: "After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice" |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval | None: "no application fee, no onboarding fee, and no monthly minimum" |
| Who holds the login | Two statements: "Creators keep their accounts, content, and logins. Always." (own ranking article) and, in the terms, the agency hands back "account credentials ... in our possession within 14 days" | Delegated access, as advice in a guide: "A legitimate agency does not need your OnlyFans, Fansly, or social media passwords" |
| Where payouts go | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator, in the terms | Creator: "The content itself remains yours, during the agreement and after it ends"; paid casting shoots excepted |
| Binding agreement public | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." | No. A sample agreement is offered after the strategy call. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Foxy Studios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 3 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 3 Partly published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 7 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Foxy Studios profile · Hush Talent profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Foxy Studios vs Hush Talent: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/foxy-studios-vs-hush-talent. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.