Comparison · #6 vs #9 · November 2026
Bunny Agency vs TDM Agency: published terms compared
Bunny Agency (#6, 6.0/10, United States): Publishes 112+ team members and 400+ creators (own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause. TDM Agency (#9, 4.1/10, United Kingdom): TDM Agency publishes a verifiable UK company with number, address and two named founders, and an in-house UK chat team. Its exit terms, a lifetime trial with no commitment, are on one acquisition page rather than the main journey. Publishes no commission (a 50% figure appears only in a referral example), no payout route, no notice period, no upfront-cost statement and no content clause; the team logs into the creator's account.
Bunny Agency ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Bunny Agency: A creator who wants one agency running her presence across ten platforms at once, and who will get the commission, the login policy and the exit terms in writing before signing. Not for a creator who wants those terms published before the call.
TDM Agency: A UK creator who wants a Companies House-registered agency and is prepared to get every commercial term in writing before signing, because none of them is on the site. Not for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login or to read the terms before the call. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Bunny Agency ranks above TDM Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Bunny Agency (6.0/10, #6) and TDM Agency (4.1/10, #9) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Bunny Agency scores higher on 8 criteria: No upfront cost (10 vs 0); Scope of the commission itemized (10 vs 5); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (5 vs 0); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7); Results with a verification route (6 vs 3); Longevity, documented (10 vs 7); Content protection included and described (7 vs 5).
TDM Agency scores higher on 2 criteria: Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (5 vs 0).
Both score the same on 4 criteria. Net difference: 1.9 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Bunny Agency | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 25–50%, published only on the agency's own comparison article; main pages say the rate is disclosed on a free consultation | Not published. Homepage: "We typically work on a revenue-share basis". The only figure, "we take our 50%", appears in a referral-program example on a separate page |
| Basis | Explained in general terms (net, after the platform's 20%, charged on revenue), not stated as the agency's own clause | Not published |
| Minimum term | "No long-term lock-in", "Cancel anytime"; no minimum term figure published | No minimum term stated. "Lifetime Trial", "ZERO commitments" and "Cancel Anytime" appear on the trans-creator landing page only; the homepage journey runs through "the contract is signed" and the FAQ speaks of "full legally binding contracts" |
| Notice period | Not published | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | Not published |
| Who holds the login | Not published | Agency logs in: "We log in, organise content, learn your voice"; creator keeps "full access" |
| Where payouts go | Not published | Not published |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated as the agency's own commitment: "You keep ownership of your OnlyFans account and your content"; license terms not published | Not published for creator content; the site terms license only material uploaded to the website |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms state that any management relationship is governed by a separate written agreement. | No. Site terms refer to separate service agreements; the FAQ confirms a signed contract. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Bunny Agency | TDM Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 0 Not found on the site Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 6 Partly published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 5 Partly published · provisional Source | 10 Published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 10 Published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 6 Partly published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Bunny Agency profile · TDM Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Bunny Agency vs TDM Agency: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/bunny-agency-vs-tdm-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.