Comparison · #3 vs #5 · November 2026
Aruna Talent vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared
Aruna Talent (#3, 6.4/10, United States): Aruna Talent publishes no commission rate, only that its share is charged on net and set on the discovery call; publishes no payout route and no post-exit clause; states the creator's own logins in its llms.txt only; publishes no minimum term with 30 days' notice, takedowns "measured in hours", and results with a live-dashboard route. Foxy Studios (#5, 6.2/10, Switzerland): Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
Aruna Talent ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Aruna Talent: A creator who is comfortable learning the commission on a call. Not for a creator with an existing following, whom the agency says it does not accept, or for one who wants the terms in writing before talking.
Foxy Studios: A creator who wants a female-led Swiss agency that takes six creators a quarter, and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants sole control of her login written into the terms. Of the 21 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 3 November 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 3 November 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 21 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Aruna Talent ranks above Foxy Studios
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Aruna Talent (6.4/10, #3) and Foxy Studios (6.2/10, #5) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Aruna Talent scores higher on 4 criteria: Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Content protection included and described (10 vs 5); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 7).
Foxy Studios scores higher on 3 criteria: Commission published (10 vs 0); Creator owns the content (10 vs 5); Longevity, documented (7 vs 4).
Both score the same on 7 criteria. Net difference: 0.2 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Aruna Talent | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published. llms.txt gives the basis only: "Aruna's share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee; the exact split is laid out on the discovery call." | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; a higher tier is set on a call |
| Basis | Net, after the platform's 20%, published | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis |
| Minimum term | None, published ("The Talent Management Agreement has no minimum term") | None; month-to-month, in the terms |
| Notice period | 30 days' written notice, on the homepage and the management page | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None, published | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval |
| Who holds the login | Creator's own logins, stated in llms.txt only | Two statements: "Creators keep their accounts, content, and logins. Always." (own ranking article) and, in the terms, the agency hands back "account credentials ... in our possession within 14 days" |
| Where payouts go | Not published | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) |
| Content ownership | Ownership stated in the terms; license terms in a private creator agreement | Creator, in the terms |
| Binding agreement public | No. The site terms say the creator relationship is governed by individual creator agreements that are not published. | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Aruna Talent | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 5 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 4 Partly published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Aruna Talent profile · Foxy Studios profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Aruna Talent vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared”, 3 November 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-foxy-studios. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.