Comparison · #3 vs #6 · October 2026
Perlage Studios vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared
Perlage Studios (#3, 6.9/10, United States): A Florida-registered agency with a team in Austria that publishes the basis of its commission, net after the platform's 20%, but not the percentage, which it agrees on the strategy call. Creator-held login, payouts to the creator's own bank, month to month with no notice period and nothing upfront, and a monthly target in the contract under which its share for a missed month is $0. Post-exit commission and content ownership are not stated as its own terms. Foxy Studios (#6, 6.2/10, Switzerland): Foxy Studios publishes a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. States the login two ways (creators keep it, and the terms return credentials in the agency's possession), includes DMCA in the standard rate, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing.
Perlage Studios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Perlage Studios: A creator who wants the basis, the login and the exit settled in writing and a target clause in the agreement, and who accepts learning the percentage on the call. Not for a creator who wants the rate in writing before any call.
Foxy Studios: A creator who wants a female-led Swiss agency that takes six creators a quarter, and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants sole control of her login written into the terms. Of the 22 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 1 October 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 1 October 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 22 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Perlage Studios ranks above Foxy Studios
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Perlage Studios (6.9/10, #3) and Foxy Studios (6.2/10, #6) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Perlage Studios scores higher on 6 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Results with a verification route (10 vs 3); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 5); Content protection included and described (7 vs 5).
Foxy Studios scores higher on 4 criteria: Creator owns the content (10 vs 0); Commission published (10 vs 0); Longevity, documented (7 vs 1); Scale and infrastructure, published (7 vs 4).
Both score the same on 4 criteria. Net difference: 0.7 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Perlage Studios | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published: "The exact percentage depends on the scope of services and is agreed on the strategy call rather than published here" | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; a higher tier is set on a call |
| Basis | Net: "calculated on net revenue, meaning what OnlyFans actually pays out after the platform has taken its own 20%" | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis |
| Minimum term | None: "the arrangement is month to month" | None; month-to-month, in the terms |
| Notice period | None: "Either side can end it at the end of any month, with no notice period" | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms |
| Commission after exit | None: "Perlage has no exit fee and nothing to pay after the contract ends" (glossary) | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "No setup fee, no exit fee, no monthly retainer, no chatter costs, no ad spend billed to the creator" | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval |
| Who holds the login | Creator: "Password and 2FA stay with the creator from the first day to the last. Perlage never holds the login." | Two statements: "Creators keep their accounts, content, and logins. Always." (own ranking article) and, in the terms, the agency hands back "account credentials ... in our possession within 14 days" |
| Where payouts go | Direct: "OnlyFans pays out to a bank account in the creator's own name. Perlage never holds or routes the money." | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) |
| Content ownership | Not stated as a term | Creator, in the terms |
| Binding agreement public | No | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Perlage Studios | Foxy Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| No commission after exit | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 0 Not found on the site Source | 10 Published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Longevity, documented | 1 Unverifiable, provisional Source | 7 Partly published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 3 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 4 Published Source | 7 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Perlage Studios profile · Foxy Studios profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Perlage Studios vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared”, 1 October 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/perlage-studios-vs-foxy-studios. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.