Comparison · #3 vs #7 · October 2026
Perlage Studios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared
Perlage Studios (#3, 6.9/10, United States): A Florida-registered agency with a team in Austria that publishes the basis of its commission, net after the platform's 20%, but not the percentage, which it agrees on the strategy call. Creator-held login, payouts to the creator's own bank, month to month with no notice period and nothing upfront, and a monthly target in the contract under which its share for a missed month is $0. Post-exit commission and content ownership are not stated as its own terms. Bunny Agency (#7, 6.0/10, United States): Publishes 112+ team members and 400+ creators (own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.
Perlage Studios ranks higher on published terms: what each agency prints on its own site and a creator can check before the first call.
Perlage Studios: A creator who wants the basis, the login and the exit settled in writing and a target clause in the agreement, and who accepts learning the percentage on the call. Not for a creator who wants the rate in writing before any call.
Bunny Agency: A creator who wants one agency running her presence across ten platforms at once, and who will get the commission, the login policy and the exit terms in writing before signing. Not for a creator who wants those terms published before the call. Of the 22 agencies in this index, FantasyRise publishes the most of what a creator can check before signing, at 9.6/10. Last checked 1 October 2026, under methodology v1.1: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 1 October 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 22 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.1. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.6/10.
Why Perlage Studios ranks above Bunny Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Perlage Studios (6.9/10, #3) and Bunny Agency (6.0/10, #7) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.1.
Perlage Studios scores higher on 6 criteria: Payouts go direct to the creator (10 vs 0); No commission after exit (10 vs 0); Creator keeps sole login (10 vs 0); Verifiable legal entity (10 vs 5); Results with a verification route (10 vs 6); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6).
Bunny Agency scores higher on 5 criteria: Longevity, documented (10 vs 1); Scale and infrastructure, published (10 vs 4); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Creator owns the content (5 vs 0); Commission published (5 vs 0).
Both score the same on 3 criteria. Net difference: 0.9 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Perlage Studios | Bunny Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published: "The exact percentage depends on the scope of services and is agreed on the strategy call rather than published here" | 25–50%, published only on the agency's own comparison article; main pages say the rate is disclosed on a free consultation |
| Basis | Net: "calculated on net revenue, meaning what OnlyFans actually pays out after the platform has taken its own 20%" | Explained in general terms (net, after the platform's 20%, charged on revenue), not stated as the agency's own clause |
| Minimum term | None: "the arrangement is month to month" | "No long-term lock-in", "Cancel anytime"; no minimum term figure published |
| Notice period | None: "Either side can end it at the end of any month, with no notice period" | Not published |
| Commission after exit | None: "Perlage has no exit fee and nothing to pay after the contract ends" (glossary) | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "No setup fee, no exit fee, no monthly retainer, no chatter costs, no ad spend billed to the creator" | None, published |
| Who holds the login | Creator: "Password and 2FA stay with the creator from the first day to the last. Perlage never holds the login." | Not published |
| Where payouts go | Direct: "OnlyFans pays out to a bank account in the creator's own name. Perlage never holds or routes the money." | Not published |
| Content ownership | Not stated as a term | Ownership stated as the agency's own commitment: "You keep ownership of your OnlyFans account and your content"; license terms not published |
| Binding agreement public | No | No. The site terms state that any management relationship is governed by a separate written agreement. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Perlage Studios | Bunny Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 0 Withheld for the call or the agreement Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| No commission after exit | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 0 Not found on the site Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published · provisional Source |
| Longevity, documented | 1 Unverifiable, provisional Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 10 Published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 4 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 7 Published Source | 7 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.1; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Perlage Studios profile · Bunny Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Perlage Studios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared”, 1 October 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/perlage-studios-vs-bunny-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.1; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.