Comparison · #5 vs #6 · September 2026
Foxy Studios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared
Foxy Studios (#5, 5.7/10, Switzerland): Publishes the most terms of any agency in the index: a 55/45 split in the creator's favor on net, month-to-month with 30 days' notice, no upfront fees, creator-owned content, five stated reasons not to sign. Does not publish who holds the login, and its own pages say the agency handles payout processing. Bunny Agency (#6, 5.6/10, United States): The largest operation in the index (112+ team, 400+ creators, own statements). Publishes a 25–50% range only inside a comparison article, no upfront cost and no lock-in; does not publish who holds the login, where payouts go, the post-exit clause or a content clause.
Foxy Studios ranks higher on published terms, which measures what each agency prints and can be checked, not how well it manages an account.
Foxy Studios: An established creator with an audience who wants the rate and the exit in writing before the first call and accepts the agency handling payouts. Not for a beginner (the agency says so), nor for a creator who wants to keep sole control of her login.
Bunny Agency: A creator who wants one agency running her presence across many platforms at once and values the security of the largest, longest-running operation, and who will get the commission, the login policy and the exit terms in writing before signing. Not for a creator who wants those terms published before the call. Last checked 12 September 2026, under methodology v1.0: fourteen equal-weight criteria on what each agency publishes on its own site.
Index snapshot, 12 September 2026. OF Agency Ranking scores 19 OnlyFans management (OFM) agencies on the terms they publish, under methodology v1.0. Current #1: FantasyRise, 9.1/10.
Why Foxy Studios ranks above Bunny Agency
Ranked on published terms. The gap between Foxy Studios (5.7/10, #5) and Bunny Agency (5.6/10, #6) comes from the criteria on which their publicly documented terms and evidence differ, scored under the fourteen equal-weight criteria of methodology v1.0.
Foxy Studios scores higher on 3 criteria: Creator owns the content (10 vs 0); Commission published (10 vs 5); No minimum term, clear exit (10 vs 6).
Bunny Agency scores higher on 4 criteria: Content protection included and described (7 vs 0); Says who should not sign (10 vs 5); Results with a verification route (6 vs 3); Longevity, documented (10 vs 7).
Both score the same on 7 criteria. Net difference: 0.1 points. Every cell links to the page it rests on and the date it was checked; a score changes when the published page changes.
Published terms side by side
| Term | Foxy Studios | Bunny Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 55/45 in the creator's favor (agency 45%), published; elite tier above $50,000 a month set on a call | 25–50%, published only on the agency's own comparison article; main pages say the rate is disclosed on a free consultation |
| Basis | Net, after the platform's 20%, on the services page and blog; the terms state the split without basis | Explained in general terms (net, after the platform's 20%, charged on revenue), not stated as the agency's own clause |
| Minimum term | None; month-to-month, in the terms | "No long-term lock-in", "Cancel anytime"; no minimum term figure published |
| Notice period | 30 days written notice, either party, in the terms | Not published |
| Commission after exit | Not published | Not published |
| Upfront cost | None: "no upfront retainers, hidden fees, or charges layered on top of the split"; ad spend billed separately with pre-approval | None, published |
| Who holds the login | Not published; the terms provide that on termination Foxy Studios hands back "account credentials, content libraries, and any other materials in our possession within 14 days", which says the agency holds credentials without saying whose they are | Not published |
| Where payouts go | "We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly" (apply page) | Not published |
| Content ownership | Creator, in the terms | Not published as the agency's own clause |
| Binding agreement public | No. "The management agreement, not these Terms, governs the working relationship." | No. The site terms state that any management relationship is governed by a separate written agreement. |
Scorecard side by side, with status and source
| Criterion | Foxy Studios | Bunny Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Commission published | 10 Published Source | 5 Partly published Source |
| Creator keeps sole login | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Payouts go direct to the creator | 0 Published, scores 0 under the band Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No minimum term, clear exit | 10 Published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| No commission after exit | 0 Not found on the site Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| No upfront cost | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Creator owns the content | 10 Published Source | 0 Not found on the site Source |
| Verifiable legal entity | 5 Partly published Source | 5 Partly published · provisional Source |
| Longevity, documented | 7 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Results with a verification route | 3 Partly published Source | 6 Partly published Source |
| Says who should not sign | 5 Partly published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scope of the commission itemized | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Scale and infrastructure, published | 10 Published Source | 10 Published Source |
| Content protection included and described | 0 Not found on the site Source | 7 Partly published Source |
Scores are published-terms scores under methodology v1.0; the status beside each score says why it scores what it scores. Data: ranking.json.
Foxy Studios profile · Bunny Agency profile · Main ranking
Evidence date and corrections. Every score on this page rests on a page the agency itself published, quoted with the URL and the date it was read. Scores reflect the evidence available on that date. If a fact is wrong or has changed since, send the link to editors@ofagencyranking.com or, for an agency contesting its own cell, to reply@ofagencyranking.com. A correction that checks out is made within one business day, dated on the updates page and listed on the corrections page. Agencies do not approve their scores; the published methodology decides them, and the route to contest a cell never closes.
Cite this page. OF Agency Ranking, “Foxy Studios vs Bunny Agency: published terms compared”, 12 September 2026, https://ofagencyranking.com/compare/foxy-studios-vs-bunny-agency. Publisher: FantasyRise LLC (disclosure). Scores follow methodology v1.0; the underlying data is ranking.json and ranking.csv, licensed CC BY 4.0. Please keep the publisher attribution with the citation.